Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-03 Thread Wilton Helm
The per-port regulators would be non-isolated. Probably feeding off
an internal 48V bus. 

Yes, so that will be 90 to 95% efficient, but it is fed from an isolated supply 
that at best will be 90%, probably less.  Those numbers must be multiplied, 
giving 81 to 86% overall efficiency--and I am assuming best in class, which 
only a switch at a high price point would offer.

Well, the bulb has a peak permissible operation temperature of about
160 degrees C ... so likely no extra cooling required 

True in open air.  However, inside a metal enclosure as I described to make it 
applicable to the situation, the enclosure would probably get warm enough to be 
a fire hazard.  The light bulb might still be fine after the building burned 
down! :-)
I've designed products and put them through UL, CSA and CE safety testing.

It'd still be a 400W PSU if it supplies 400W

You can play various games with the numbers, such as choosing input versus 
output power to write in the spec.  The label will have to indicate 500 W of 
power consumed, by law.  No matter how one plays with the numbers, an 80% 
efficient supply that delivers 360 watts will consume 450 W, and turn 90 W into 
heat.  If it is rated for 400 W output, it is probably in a portion of its 
range at 360 W where it is achieving near optimal efficiency and the above math 
would apply.

In cases where half the loads drew less power and/or were not POE loads, the 
consumption would go down, and so would the heat.  However the manufacturer 
can't design for that case and if they don't provide automatic fan control 
(which apparently most switches don't have), the fan must be designed for worst 
case, which in the above example is 100 W of heat.  Also, at 25 to 50 % load, 
the efficiency will probably be lower because it was optimized for a larger 
load, and because some losses are fixed (not load dependent).

This whole thread is getting stupid

If some increase in understanding occurs, then it isn't a waste.  No it won't 
change the behavior of any switches, but it might help people understand why.

Wilton

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Steve Underwood wrote:

 Bernd Felsche wrote:
 Ian Cowley i...@moffat.co.uk wrote:


 Beware PoE switches that can't handle Class 3 (15W) on all ports.
 Most have fans because 24 (or 48) x 15W is hot!


 That's the power supplied .. which'd be at the far end of the wire.

 The efficiency of the PSU plays a big part in the heat dissipation.
 The push to compact dimensions doesn't help ... a 400W or
 thereabouts PSU with 24 independent outputs in 1U height? I suppose
 if the switch were quite deep it could be workable and quiet.

 The problem isn't simply of being fanless. But being quiet.
 Preferably below 32 dBA at 1 metres for most offices.

 You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
 that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
 fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
 dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
 sufficient airflow when the positions above and below are filled.

 So, size does matter after all. :-)

 24 x 15W = 360W. Its not that big a supply really, and spread across a
 1U case its not that dense a supply. A 360W desktop PC supply can be
 pretty quiet, so its sad none of the 1U chassis supplies are. Probably
 if they used a large impeller fan they could get the noise down. I guess
 they assume these things will be in cupboards or data centres where
 nobody cares. This is a poor assumption.

I think you might be missing what Bernd Felsche wrote - 24 * 15W is indeed 
360W, but the power supply will not be dissipating that - the phones at 
the far-end will. A modern switched mode PSU ought to be more than 90% 
efficient, so that means the PSU should only be dissipating 30 watts or 
so. Easy enough to keep cool with little or no fans. Same for those PC 
PSUs - the PSUs themselves really shouldn't be dissipating that much power 
(as heat). I suspect some early PSU makers just put fans in because.

Early ethernet switches did get hot - because of all the switching going 
on in their chips, so it wouldn't surprise me if most of the heat coming 
out of them was actuall the Ethernet part of it - esepcially at Gb levels 
than the power convertors...

Gordon


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Wilton Helm
A modern switched mode PSU ought to be more than 90% efficient,

In theory, yes, in practice, not likely.  It is harder to get high efficiency 
from an isolated supply than a non-isolated one.  I get ads from IC 
manufacturers all the time about there 90 to 95% efficient solutions, but these 
are boost or buck regulators--non-isolated.  State of the art in commercial 
practice for isolated supplies is around 80 to 85%, and typical commercial 
practice is more like 70 to 80%.  Now you have more like 60 watts of heat 
radiating from this power supply.  Go stick a 60 watt light bulb (incandescent) 
in a small metal box and see how easy it is to keep cool.

Wilton
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Singer XJ Wang

[snipped]

You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
sufficient airflow when the positions above and below are filled.
  
How are you getting these 80 or 120mm fans in a 1U chassis? Remember you 
got barely 45mm to play
with at the back and front of the switch. How are you going to mount a 
80mm or 120mm fan on there? Are you assuming that the units mounted

above (or below) your switch is a short 1U? You can't assume that...
begin:vcard
fn:Singer Wang
n:Wang;Singer
org:The Pythian Group;Team 13
adr:116 Albert Street;;Suite 1000;Ottawa;Ontario;K1P 5G3;Canada
email;internet:w...@pythian.com
title:System and Database Administrator
tel;work:(613) 565-8696 x298
tel;fax:(613) 565-8710
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.pythian.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Steve Underwood
Singer XJ Wang wrote:
 [snipped]
 You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
 that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
 fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
 dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
 sufficient airflow when the positions above and below are filled.
   
 How are you getting these 80 or 120mm fans in a 1U chassis? Remember 
 you got barely 45mm to play
 with at the back and front of the switch. How are you going to mount a 
 80mm or 120mm fan on there? Are you assuming that the units mounted
 above (or below) your switch is a short 1U? You can't assume that...
A number of 1U products use large impeller fans. They take more internal 
space in the chassis, but they are slower and quieter. Tiny whiny seems 
to be the current fashion, though.

Steve


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Wilton Helm
A number of 1U products use large impeller fans

I've got a CPU in a 1U package with an impeller fan.  It sounds like a jet 
taking off!  Its not quiet.

Wilton
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Singer XJ Wang

We got a few of those in 1U chassis.. if you think those are quiet...

Steve Underwood wrote:

Singer XJ Wang wrote:

[snipped]

You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
sufficient airflow when the positions above and below are filled.
  
How are you getting these 80 or 120mm fans in a 1U chassis? Remember 
you got barely 45mm to play
with at the back and front of the switch. How are you going to mount 
a 80mm or 120mm fan on there? Are you assuming that the units mounted

above (or below) your switch is a short 1U? You can't assume that...
A number of 1U products use large impeller fans. They take more 
internal space in the chassis, but they are slower and quieter. Tiny 
whiny seems to be the current fashion, though.


Steve

begin:vcard
fn:Singer Wang
n:Wang;Singer
org:The Pythian Group;Team 13
adr:116 Albert Street;;Suite 1000;Ottawa;Ontario;K1P 5G3;Canada
email;internet:w...@pythian.com
title:System and Database Administrator
tel;work:(613) 565-8696 x298
tel;fax:(613) 565-8710
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.pythian.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Benny Amorsen
Paul Hales pdha...@optusnet.com.au writes:

 My memory of a HP procurve (a 2626 PWR from memory) was that it was
 quite noisy - have they changed?

The 2626 is either extremely noisy or fairly noisy, depending on which
you happen to get. Luck of the draw; I haven't found a way to predict
it. The 2650 is almost always in the fairly category.

However, the 2610-24 is fanless, which sounds great. Except the PoE
versions aren't fanless. The 2610-24/12PWR is not THAT bad unless
it gets hot, the 24PWR and 48PWR are fairly noisy.


/Benny


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Bill Michaelson


How are you getting these 80 or 120mm fans in a 1U chassis? Remember you 
got barely 45mm to play
with at the back and front of the switch. How are you going to mount a 
80mm or 120mm fan on there? Are you assuming that the units mounted

above (or below) your switch is a short 1U? You can't assume that...

  

I guess one shouldn't assume as a rule, but...

If I were concerned about noise, it would be because I am positioning 
this near people, and not in a densely-packed rack. Thus I would be OK 
eliminating the 1U constraint. I think these tend to be distinct 
deployment scenarios.


And thinking about that, do PoE switches tend to be deployed near 
people? You tell me.


I'd like to find a quiet 24-port PoE switch - even at 100 Mb.






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Christian Victor
2009/2/2 Singer XJ Wang w...@pythian.com

 [snipped]

 You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
 that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
 fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
 dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
 sufficient airflow when the positions above and below are filled.


 How are you getting these 80 or 120mm fans in a 1U chassis? Remember you
 got barely 45mm to play
 with at the back and front of the switch. How are you going to mount a 80mm
 or 120mm fan on there? Are you assuming that the units mounted
 above (or below) your switch is a short 1U? You can't assume that...


Ever heared of a centrifugal fan? ;-)

Chris
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Steve Underwood
Gordon Henderson wrote:
 On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Steve Underwood wrote:

   
 Bernd Felsche wrote:
 
 Ian Cowley i...@moffat.co.uk wrote:


   
 Beware PoE switches that can't handle Class 3 (15W) on all ports.
 Most have fans because 24 (or 48) x 15W is hot!

 
 That's the power supplied .. which'd be at the far end of the wire.

 The efficiency of the PSU plays a big part in the heat dissipation.
 The push to compact dimensions doesn't help ... a 400W or
 thereabouts PSU with 24 independent outputs in 1U height? I suppose
 if the switch were quite deep it could be workable and quiet.

 The problem isn't simply of being fanless. But being quiet.
 Preferably below 32 dBA at 1 metres for most offices.

 You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
 that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
 fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
 dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
 sufficient airflow when the positions above and below are filled.

   
 So, size does matter after all. :-)

 24 x 15W = 360W. Its not that big a supply really, and spread across a
 1U case its not that dense a supply. A 360W desktop PC supply can be
 pretty quiet, so its sad none of the 1U chassis supplies are. Probably
 if they used a large impeller fan they could get the noise down. I guess
 they assume these things will be in cupboards or data centres where
 nobody cares. This is a poor assumption.
 

 I think you might be missing what Bernd Felsche wrote - 24 * 15W is indeed 
 360W, but the power supply will not be dissipating that - the phones at 
 the far-end will. A modern switched mode PSU ought to be more than 90% 
 efficient, so that means the PSU should only be dissipating 30 watts or 
 so. Easy enough to keep cool with little or no fans. Same for those PC 
 PSUs - the PSUs themselves really shouldn't be dissipating that much power 
 (as heat). I suspect some early PSU makers just put fans in because.
   
I think you definitely are missing what I wrote. I said its a 360W power 
supply, which it is. Its dissipation should be comparable with a 360W PC 
supply, though the per port power control will add a bit to the total 
dissipation.

Very few supplies are 90% efficient, and they only hit their peak 
efficiency at some magic load settings. An efficiency of 70-80% is far 
more likely. Try looking at some specs for PC supplies.
 Early ethernet switches did get hot - because of all the switching going 
 on in their chips, so it wouldn't surprise me if most of the heat coming 
 out of them was actuall the Ethernet part of it - esepcially at Gb levels 
 than the power convertors...
   

Most current Gig-E chips get hot when plugged into a Gig-E device, but 
run very cool when plugged into a 100M device. A lot Gig-E stuff 
actually overheats badly in such circumstances. If the sales of Gig-E 
switches rises, a lot  of people are going to find their motherboards 
roasting. :-)

Steve


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Singer XJ Wang

Honestly, how are you guys expecting a 24 Port POE to be fanless?

Lets start with some logical points here:

1) 24 Ports x 15.4W/Port = 369.4Watts + Switch Power = ~400Watts... now 
Power Supply isn't that efficient so you're getting probably a 500Watt 
Power Supply (assuming 80%)...


2) with a 1U chassis, you can't blow air up or down... only front and 
back.. so you're stuck with a 40mm fan..


...




Benny Amorsen wrote:

Paul Hales pdha...@optusnet.com.au writes:

  

My memory of a HP procurve (a 2626 PWR from memory) was that it was
quite noisy - have they changed?



The 2626 is either extremely noisy or fairly noisy, depending on which
you happen to get. Luck of the draw; I haven't found a way to predict
it. The 2650 is almost always in the fairly category.

However, the 2610-24 is fanless, which sounds great. Except the PoE
versions aren't fanless. The 2610-24/12PWR is not THAT bad unless
it gets hot, the 24PWR and 48PWR are fairly noisy.


/Benny


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
begin:vcard
fn:Singer Wang
n:Wang;Singer
org:The Pythian Group;Team 13
adr:116 Albert Street;;Suite 1000;Ottawa;Ontario;K1P 5G3;Canada
email;internet:w...@pythian.com
title:System and Database Administrator
tel;work:(613) 565-8696 x298
tel;fax:(613) 565-8710
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.pythian.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Singer XJ Wang

Okay, point out one reasonably priced PoE switch that has it.


Christian Victor wrote:

2009/2/2 Singer XJ Wang w...@pythian.com mailto:w...@pythian.com

[snipped]

You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney,
40mm fans
that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
sufficient airflow when the positions above and below are filled.
 


How are you getting these 80 or 120mm fans in a 1U chassis?
Remember you got barely 45mm to play
with at the back and front of the switch. How are you going to
mount a 80mm or 120mm fan on there? Are you assuming that the
units mounted
above (or below) your switch is a short 1U? You can't assume that...


Ever heared of a centrifugal fan? ;-)

Chris

begin:vcard
fn:Singer Wang
n:Wang;Singer
org:The Pythian Group;Team 13
adr:116 Albert Street;;Suite 1000;Ottawa;Ontario;K1P 5G3;Canada
email;internet:w...@pythian.com
title:System and Database Administrator
tel;work:(613) 565-8696 x298
tel;fax:(613) 565-8710
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.pythian.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Bernd Felsche
Steve Underwood ste...@coppice.org wrote:
Gordon Henderson wrote:
 On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Steve Underwood wrote:
 Bernd Felsche wrote:
 Ian Cowley i...@moffat.co.uk wrote:

 Beware PoE switches that can't handle Class 3 (15W) on all ports.
 Most have fans because 24 (or 48) x 15W is hot!

 That's the power supplied .. which'd be at the far end of the wire.

 The efficiency of the PSU plays a big part in the heat dissipation.
 The push to compact dimensions doesn't help ... a 400W or
 thereabouts PSU with 24 independent outputs in 1U height? I suppose
 if the switch were quite deep it could be workable and quiet.

 The problem isn't simply of being fanless. But being quiet.
 Preferably below 32 dBA at 1 metres for most offices.

 You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
 that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
 fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
 dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
 sufficient airflow when the positions above and below are filled.

 So, size does matter after all. :-)

 24 x 15W = 360W. Its not that big a supply really, and spread
 across a 1U case its not that dense a supply. A 360W desktop PC
 supply can be pretty quiet, so its sad none of the 1U chassis
 supplies are. Probably if they used a large impeller fan they
 could get the noise down. I guess they assume these things will
 be in cupboards or data centres where nobody cares. This is a
 poor assumption.

 I think you might be missing what Bernd Felsche wrote - 24 * 15W
 is indeed 360W, but the power supply will not be dissipating that
 - the phones at the far-end will. A modern switched mode PSU
 ought to be more than 90% efficient, so that means the PSU should
 only be dissipating 30 watts or so. Easy enough to keep cool with
 little or no fans. Same for those PC PSUs - the PSUs themselves
 really shouldn't be dissipating that much power (as heat). I
 suspect some early PSU makers just put fans in because.

I think you definitely are missing what I wrote. I said its a 360W power 
supply, which it is. Its dissipation should be comparable with a 360W PC 
supply, though the per port power control will add a bit to the total 
dissipation.

Very few supplies are 90% efficient, and they only hit their peak 
efficiency at some magic load settings. An efficiency of 70-80% is far 
more likely. Try looking at some specs for PC supplies.

The PoE switches tend to use better than the cheapest-available
technology. 90% is fairly easy to achieve except at the bottom end
of the load capacity range ... i.e. when power drawn is only a few
percent of the rated capacity. Efficiency can vary significantly,
depending on load.

The other point which I made, in addition to the 360W being
dissipated by the appliances, is that there is a power supply for
each PoE port. Each independently-regulated and and current limited,
commonly even under software control as is seems that most of these
sorts of switches are managed/managable. All of them appear to sense
automatically if the connected appliance requires PoE.

Even without being gigabit speed at each PoE port, the independent
PSU per port alone increases the heat dissipation; probably in the
order of half to one watt per port; within the switch.

The designers of the switches seem to be able to incorporate all
sorts of clever tricks in their management interfaces. But most
don't automatically control the fans according to the temperature.
-- 
/\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
\ /  ASCII ribbon campaign | Religion is regarded by the common people
 X   against HTML mail | as true, by the wise as false, and by the
/ \  and postings  | rulers as useful.  -- Seneca the Younger


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Bernd Felsche
Wilton Helm wh...@compuserve.com wrote:

A modern switched mode PSU ought to be more than 90% efficient,

In theory, yes, in practice, not likely.  It is harder to get high
efficiency from an isolated supply than a non-isolated one.  I get ads
from IC manufacturers all the time about there 90 to 95% efficient
solutions, but these are boost or buck regulators--non-isolated.  State
of the art in commercial practice for isolated supplies is around 80 to
85%, and typical commercial practice is more like 70 to 80%.  

The per-port regulators would be non-isolated. Probably feeding off
an internal 48V bus.

Now you
have more like 60 watts of heat radiating from this power supply.  Go
stick a 60 watt light bulb (incandescent) in a small metal box and see
how easy it is to keep cool.

Well, the bulb has a peak permissible operation temperature of about
160 degrees C ... so likely no extra cooling required. :-)
-- 
/\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
\ /  ASCII ribbon campaign | Religion is regarded by the common people
 X   against HTML mail | as true, by the wise as false, and by the
/ \  and postings  | rulers as useful.  -- Seneca the Younger


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Bernd Felsche
Singer XJ Wang w...@pythian.com wrote:

Honestly, how are you guys expecting a 24 Port POE to be fanless?

Lets start with some logical points here:

1) 24 Ports x 15.4W/Port = 369.4Watts + Switch Power = ~400Watts... now 
Power Supply isn't that efficient so you're getting probably a 500Watt 
Power Supply (assuming 80%)...

It'd still be a 400W PSU if it supplies 400W.

2) with a 1U chassis, you can't blow air up or down... only front and 
back.. so you're stuck with a 40mm fan..

And the sides...

... you can fit a muffin fan horizontally as suggested and allow it
to draw in or to blow air at the top or botton within the height of
the 1U.  Muffin fans are 25 to 35 mm high.

Placed centrally, the fans can draw in air from around the port
connectors on the front panel (if the back-end of the connectors is
sealed!) and blow into the PSU, exiting at the back. This also helps
to reduce the little fan noise that remains, leaving mostly white
noise from the air flow itself (unless you install whistles).
-- 
/\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
\ /  ASCII ribbon campaign | Religion is regarded by the common people
 X   against HTML mail | as true, by the wise as false, and by the
/ \  and postings  | rulers as useful.  -- Seneca the Younger


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Michael
 Lets start with some logical points here:
 
 1) 24 Ports x 15.4W/Port = 369.4Watts + Switch Power = ~400Watts... now
 Power Supply isn't that efficient so you're getting probably a 500Watt
 Power Supply (assuming 80%)...

 It'd still be a 400W PSU if it supplies 400W.

 2) with a 1U chassis, you can't blow air up or down... only front and
 back.. so you're stuck with a 40mm fan..

 And the sides...

 ... you can fit a muffin fan horizontally as suggested and allow it
 to draw in or to blow air at the top or botton within the height of
 the 1U.  Muffin fans are 25 to 35 mm high.

This whole thread is getting stupid and I'd hope the people involved would 
desist from this O/T drivel.

If you want a switch go to the shop, hand over some money and buy one... Like 
every one else does and they're perfectly happy with their purchase.

The O.P. is not going to change the world and quite frankly the 
designer/manufacturer of the product knows a lot more about the subject then 
they do

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-02 Thread Paul Hales

 This whole thread is getting stupid and I'd hope the people involved would 
 desist from this O/T drivel.

 If you want a switch go to the shop, hand over some money and buy one... Like 
 every one else does and they're perfectly happy with their purchase.

 The O.P. is not going to change the world and quite frankly the 
 designer/manufacturer of the product knows a lot more about the subject then 
 they do


   

It's really just a lot of hot air.
(ducks and runs for cover)

PaulH

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-01 Thread OCG Technical Support
Check out the HP ProCurve Switch 2610-24-PWR

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chris Bagnall
Sent: February 1, 2009 6:58 AM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

 I can find FANLESS 24 port PoE 10/100

That's an achievement in itself. Can you post details - I have quite a few
locations where that might be useful...

TIA.

Regards,

Chris



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-01 Thread Chris Bagnall
 I can find FANLESS 24 port PoE 10/100

That's an achievement in itself. Can you post details - I have quite a few 
locations where that might be useful...

TIA.

Regards,

Chris



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-01 Thread Ian Cowley
Beware PoE switches that can't handle Class 3 (15W) on all ports.
Most have fans because 24 (or 48) x 15W is hot!

IanC

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com 
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chris Bagnall
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 11:58 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

 I can find FANLESS 24 port PoE 10/100

That's an achievement in itself. Can you post details - I have quite a few 
locations where that might be useful...

TIA.

Regards,

Chris



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

Moffat Communications Limited is a wholly owned Company of Grant Thornton UK 
LLP, registered in England and Wales, with number 2355810, and whose registered 
office is Grant Thornton House, Melton Street, Euston Square, London, NW1 2EP. 
Moffat Communications Limited is registered to carry out Business and 
management consultancy. When addressed to our clients, any opinions or advice 
set out in this email and any attachments are subject to the terms and 
conditions expressed in the relevant Moffat Communications Limited client 
engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this email 
which do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor 
endorsed by it. Any personal views expressed in this message are not 
necessarily the views of Moffat Communications Limited.

 

This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is private and confidential. If you 
are not the intended recipient, employee or agent responsible for delivering 
the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its 
attachments is strictly prohibited.

 

If you have received this communication and its attachments in error, please 
return the original message and attachments to us using the reply facility on 
e-mail. Moffat Communications Limited has scanned this email for viruses but 
does not accept any responsibility once this email has been transmitted. You 
should scan attachments (if any) for viruses. Any person communicating with us 
by e-mail will be deemed to have accepted the risks associated with sending 
information by e-mail being interception, amendment and loss, and also the 
consequences of incomplete or late delivery.
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-01 Thread Olivier
2009/1/31 OCG Technical Support supp...@ocg.ca

  A little off topic but



 I need to put a 24 port Gig PoE switch into a small office – no computer
 room / rack etc.  All CAT5 terminates near the owners desk (smart huh?).



 I want to put a PoE switch in place, with 24 ports and Gig speed.  Everyone
 I've researched so far is LOUD...



 Anyone know of a quiet one?



 Thanks



 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


I can't remember the exact model but I used a Cisco catalyst switch for a
class and after reboot, it was very quiet.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-01 Thread Sam Tam
As far as I know all POE switches are quite noisy, they need to cool the
extra power consumed by the POE and hence they will run warmer than other
switch.
I know Cisco, 3COM, are very noisy but you can try other cheaper brand like
levelone or other to see if they have fans inside the switch.

Good Luck

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Olivier
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:06 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch



2009/1/31 OCG Technical Support supp...@ocg.ca


A little off topic but

 

I need to put a 24 port Gig PoE switch into a small office - no
computer room / rack etc.  All CAT5 terminates near the owners desk (smart
huh?).

 

I want to put a PoE switch in place, with 24 ports and Gig speed.
Everyone I've researched so far is LOUD...

 

Anyone know of a quiet one?

 

Thanks

 


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



I can't remember the exact model but I used a Cisco catalyst switch for a
class and after reboot, it was very quiet.




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-01 Thread Wilton Helm
I guess one would have to ask whether 1000 Gb is necessary.  That's a lot of 
bandwidth.  It might make sense to use it for central distribution.  There are 
also some that have one or two 1000 Gb ports that might be appropriate for 
trunking and the rest 100 Mb which is probably fast enough for terminal nodes.  
That combination would be less power hungry.

On the other hand if this is for HDTV multichannel distribution, then I retract 
what I said.

Wilton
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-01 Thread Bernd Felsche
Ian Cowley i...@moffat.co.uk wrote:

Beware PoE switches that can't handle Class 3 (15W) on all ports.
Most have fans because 24 (or 48) x 15W is hot!

That's the power supplied .. which'd be at the far end of the wire.

The efficiency of the PSU plays a big part in the heat dissipation.
The push to compact dimensions doesn't help ... a 400W or
thereabouts PSU with 24 independent outputs in 1U height? I suppose
if the switch were quite deep it could be workable and quiet.

The problem isn't simply of being fanless. But being quiet.
Preferably below 32 dBA at 1 metres for most offices.

You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
sufficient airflow when the positions above and below are filled.
-- 
/\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
\ /  ASCII ribbon campaign | Religion is regarded by the common people
 X   against HTML mail | as true, by the wise as false, and by the
/ \  and postings  | rulers as useful.  -- Seneca the Younger


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-01 Thread Paul Hales

My memory of a HP procurve (a 2626 PWR from memory) was that it was
quite noisy - have they changed?

PaulH


OCG Technical Support wrote:
 Check out the HP ProCurve Switch 2610-24-PWR

 -Original Message-
 From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
 [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chris Bagnall
 Sent: February 1, 2009 6:58 AM
 To: Asterisk Users List
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

   
 I can find FANLESS 24 port PoE 10/100
 

 That's an achievement in itself. Can you post details - I have quite a few
 locations where that might be useful...

 TIA.

 Regards,

 Chris



 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-01 Thread Steve Underwood
Bernd Felsche wrote:
 Ian Cowley i...@moffat.co.uk wrote:

   
 Beware PoE switches that can't handle Class 3 (15W) on all ports.
 Most have fans because 24 (or 48) x 15W is hot!
 

 That's the power supplied .. which'd be at the far end of the wire.

 The efficiency of the PSU plays a big part in the heat dissipation.
 The push to compact dimensions doesn't help ... a 400W or
 thereabouts PSU with 24 independent outputs in 1U height? I suppose
 if the switch were quite deep it could be workable and quiet.

 The problem isn't simply of being fanless. But being quiet.
 Preferably below 32 dBA at 1 metres for most offices.

 You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
 that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
 fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
 dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
 sufficient airflow when the positions above and below are filled.
   
So, size does matter after all. :-)

24 x 15W = 360W. Its not that big a supply really, and spread across a 
1U case its not that dense a supply. A 360W desktop PC supply can be 
pretty quiet, so its sad none of the 1U chassis supplies are. Probably 
if they used a large impeller fan they could get the noise down. I guess 
they assume these things will be in cupboards or data centres where 
nobody cares. This is a poor assumption.

Regards,
Steve


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-01 Thread OCG Technical Support
My google search says fanless...

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hales
Sent: February 1, 2009 6:49 PM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch
Importance: High


My memory of a HP procurve (a 2626 PWR from memory) was that it was
quite noisy - have they changed?

PaulH


OCG Technical Support wrote:
 Check out the HP ProCurve Switch 2610-24-PWR

 -Original Message-
 From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
 [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chris
Bagnall
 Sent: February 1, 2009 6:58 AM
 To: Asterisk Users List
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

   
 I can find FANLESS 24 port PoE 10/100
 

 That's an achievement in itself. Can you post details - I have quite a few
 locations where that might be useful...

 TIA.

 Regards,

 Chris



 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-02-01 Thread D Tucny
2009/2/2 Steve Underwood ste...@coppice.org

 Bernd Felsche wrote:
  Ian Cowley i...@moffat.co.uk wrote:
 
 
  Beware PoE switches that can't handle Class 3 (15W) on all ports.
  Most have fans because 24 (or 48) x 15W is hot!
 
 
  That's the power supplied .. which'd be at the far end of the wire.
 
  The efficiency of the PSU plays a big part in the heat dissipation.
  The push to compact dimensions doesn't help ... a 400W or
  thereabouts PSU with 24 independent outputs in 1U height? I suppose
  if the switch were quite deep it could be workable and quiet.
 
  The problem isn't simply of being fanless. But being quiet.
  Preferably below 32 dBA at 1 metres for most offices.
 
  You can do that by using fans other than the tiny, whiney, 40mm fans
  that vibrate at 6000 to 18,000 Hz. A couple of 80 or 120 mm muffin
  fans at the back or front, pushing air in (hence the deep
  dimensions), but the top and bottom would need recesses to allow
  sufficient airflow when the positions above and below are filled.
 
 So, size does matter after all. :-)

 24 x 15W = 360W. Its not that big a supply really, and spread across a
 1U case its not that dense a supply. A 360W desktop PC supply can be
 pretty quiet, so its sad none of the 1U chassis supplies are. Probably
 if they used a large impeller fan they could get the noise down. I guess
 they assume these things will be in cupboards or data centres where
 nobody cares. This is a poor assumption.


The problem is squeezing fans in that can push enough air to keep it cool...
For a 1U device, you have only 4.445cm to work with, with a 4mm fan, that
would be 2.2mm of space for casing etc above and below, reasonably tight
already... A quiet 80mm fan as you may find in a PC PSU that puts out
somewhere between 15-20dBA of noise will typically move between 20 and 30
cfm of air... A quiet 120mm fan at the same noise levels would typically
move between 30 and 50 cfm of air and a quiet 40mm at those levels would
move about 5 cfm of air... Obviously, they aren't using quiet 40mm fans...
To get the airflow of the quiet 80mm fans, a 40mm fan has to go very fast
and you're looking at noise levels of approx 40-60dBA, not exactly quiet,
but, that's not all, even if the fan was silent, forcing the air through the
small cramped chassis of a 1U device is going to be noisy...

The assumption made when they make these devices is that the vast majority
of people will put this kit somewhere out of the way in a likely temperature
controlled, reasonably sound insulated environment, with the rest of their
hardware that lives hidden from people... These people will likely prefer
that kit uses the space as efficiently as possible, so, squeezing as much
functionality into as few rack units as possible is important... They have
typically made a good assumption in this I would say... Admittedly, people
who are planning an office for their first time may more commonly neglect IT
hardware, it's requirements (and those of those people around it), from an
IT standpoint, it's a significant pain to deal with, but, in most cases I've
seen, it's something that's considered very carefully if planning an office
in the future...

I suspect the lack of larger quieter units in the market is reflective of
the much lower demand for these, somewhat specialised devices... On the
otherhand, soundproofed rack cabinets that have integrated cooling and look
nice/plain enough that they don't scare people in an office should be
generic enough that there would, I suspect, be sufficient demand from those
that didn't consider IT requirements when fitting out an office to justify
making them...

d
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-01-31 Thread Claus Herwig
Hello,

 I need to put a 24 port Gig PoE switch into a small office – no computer 
 room / rack etc.  All CAT5 terminates near the owners desk (smart huh?).

I had a similar problem some days ago. 24-port GBit Switch in the middle 
of a classroom...

I ended up with a kind of semi-loud setup: I bought a 3Com 3CBLSG 
switch (this is without PoE, but there is a PoE version of it). There 
are two quite noisy 40x40x10 fans inside. I replaced the two with one 
40x40x20 ebmPapst silent fan (model 412/2, 18dB), left the other fan 
offline and mounted the whole thing vertically so that convection 
supports the remaining fan. I tried with two silent fans (enough space 
inside), but this still was too noisy.

Some measurement indicates the cooling is sufficient this way. But 
understand that I've no long term data, as I installed this setup just 
two weeks ago. And of course your warranty is void ;-)

Greets,
   Claus

-- 
CHECON   EDV-Consulting und Redaktion
  Claus Herwig * Barer Straße 70 * 80799 München
  +49 89 27826981 * Fax 27826982 * c.her...@checon.de


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-01-31 Thread Jerry Jones
You will have a hard time finding a 24 port POE without fans - too  
high of a power density. Do you really need 24 ports? perhaps a 12x12  
otherwise multiple 8 or 12 port models may work

Do let us know if you find a 24 port without fans.


On Jan 31, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Claus Herwig wrote:

 Hello,

 I need to put a 24 port Gig PoE switch into a small office – no  
 computer
 room / rack etc.  All CAT5 terminates near the owners desk (smart  
 huh?).

 I had a similar problem some days ago. 24-port GBit Switch in the  
 middle
 of a classroom...

 I ended up with a kind of semi-loud setup: I bought a 3Com 3CBLSG
 switch (this is without PoE, but there is a PoE version of it). There
 are two quite noisy 40x40x10 fans inside. I replaced the two with one
 40x40x20 ebmPapst silent fan (model 412/2, 18dB), left the other fan
 offline and mounted the whole thing vertically so that convection
 supports the remaining fan. I tried with two silent fans (enough space
 inside), but this still was too noisy.

 Some measurement indicates the cooling is sufficient this way. But
 understand that I've no long term data, as I installed this setup just
 two weeks ago. And of course your warranty is void ;-)

 Greets,
   Claus

 -- 
 CHECON   EDV-Consulting und Redaktion
  Claus Herwig * Barer Straße 70 * 80799 München
  +49 89 27826981 * Fax 27826982 * c.her...@checon.de


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-01-31 Thread Darrick Hartman
OCG Technical Support wrote:
 A little off topic but
 
  
 
 I need to put a 24 port Gig PoE switch into a small office – no computer 
 room / rack etc.  All CAT5 terminates near the owners desk (smart huh?).
 
  
 
 I want to put a PoE switch in place, with 24 ports and Gig speed.  
 Everyone I’ve researched so far is LOUD...

Chances of finding a PoE switch that is quiet out of the box is about as 
good as finding a government 'worker'.  It's kind of an oxymoron.

Of the switches I've used, the Linksys/Cisco line was the loudest. 
Dlink's were quieter, but still not something you'd want sitting next to 
a desk.  About the only fanless PoE switches I've seen are the smaller 
Netgear's, but they are not Gigabit.

Darrick

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch

2009-01-31 Thread OCG Technical Support
I can find FANLESS 24 port PoE 10/100, or FANLESS 24 port non-POE
10/100/1000

I guess I'll just have to wait for newer chips..till then dropping down to
10/100

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Darrick
Hartman
Sent: January 31, 2009 10:02 PM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Quiet 24 port POE gig switch
Importance: High

OCG Technical Support wrote:
 A little off topic but
 
  
 
 I need to put a 24 port Gig PoE switch into a small office - no computer 
 room / rack etc.  All CAT5 terminates near the owners desk (smart huh?).
 
  
 
 I want to put a PoE switch in place, with 24 ports and Gig speed.  
 Everyone I've researched so far is LOUD...

Chances of finding a PoE switch that is quiet out of the box is about as 
good as finding a government 'worker'.  It's kind of an oxymoron.

Of the switches I've used, the Linksys/Cisco line was the loudest. 
Dlink's were quieter, but still not something you'd want sitting next to 
a desk.  About the only fanless PoE switches I've seen are the smaller 
Netgear's, but they are not Gigabit.

Darrick

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users