Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Simple support on Asterisk 11

2013-06-20 Thread Matthew J. Roth
Eloi,

My responses are inline.

 Thanks a lot for this detailed answer :

You're welcome.  Thank you for responding.  A lot of people forget to do so and
future list readers are left wondering whether or not the proposed solution
worked.

 - I managed to have it working disabling auth message request :
   auth_message_requests = no in sip.conf
 - pedantic=no does not resolve the issue
 - reenabling  auth_message_requests = yes and removing pedantic option, your
   patch in chan_sip resolves the issues !

 As it looks like pidgin has an issue, I guess that we can use it as a
 workaround.

I'm glad my patch worked but keep in mind that it really is a workaround,
because it will cause actual retransmits of MESSAGE requests to be treated as
new requests.  This may not cause you any issues, but the root problem should
still be addressed by submitting a report to the Pidgin bug tracker [1].  It's
a straightforward problem so if you provide a link to your original post [2] the
developers should be able to resolve it quickly.

 I would like know to enable presence notification between each users. To
 fulfill it, I am using
 http://asteriskdocs.org/en/3rd_Edition/asterisk-book-html-chunk/DeviceStates_id265377.html

 Am I doing it in a good way ?

Yes, but there is a 4th edition of Asterisk: The Definitive Guide available
in the Open Feedback Publishing System [3] that is focused on documenting
Asterisk 11.

[1] https://developer.pidgin.im/wiki/TipsForBugReports
[2] http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2013-June/279569.html
[3] http://ofps.oreilly.com/titles/9781449332426/asterisk-DeviceStates.html

Regards,

Matthew Roth
InterMedia Marketing Solutions
Software Engineer and Systems Developer

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Simple support on Asterisk 11

2013-06-19 Thread Matthew J. Roth
Eloi Bail wrote:

 I am trying to enable SIP SIMPLE communication in my test environment.

 I have the following env :

 - one server (192.168.50.126) with Asterisk 11
 - 2 clients using pidgin : demo-bob and demo-alice on my 192.168.50.143

 I successfully had a phone call between clients.

 I used the following link to enable SIMPLE messaging between my clients :
 http://highsecurity.blogspot.ca/2012/03/asterisk-10-110-sms-messaging-or-sip.html

 Both users managed to register.

 Adding verbose on the server, I have the following traces when I send the
 message MESSAGE FROM ALICE TO BOB from demo-alice to demo-bob

 http://paste.fedoraproject.org/19489/37158861/

 As you can see I succeed to have the message sent from alice to Asterisk.

 When the server is trying to transmitting, I see a 401 error message.
 According to this post ( http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?f=1t=72814 )
 the first 401 should be normal as authentication is requested.

 Afterwards the server emit 202 message.

 But demo-bob never receives a message.
 I ran wireshark on server and client. It confirms that no message is sent from
 Asterisk to demo-bob.

 Could you please give me advice ?

 Here are my extensions.conf and sip.conf according to the link I mentioned.
 http://paste.fedoraproject.org/19626/16493741/

 http://paste.fedoraproject.org/19627/49423137/


Eloi,

The trace shows that the initial MESSAGE from Alice does not include an
Authorization header so Asterisk responds with a 401 Unauthorized.  Alice then
replies with a MESSAGE with an Authorization header, but reuses the same CSeq
header (CSeq: 6 MESSAGE) which causes Asterisk to ignore it as a retransmit:

 [Jun 18 16:49:35] DEBUG[16266] chan_sip.c: Ignoring SIP message because of
 retransmit (MESSAGE Seqno 6, ours 6)

I believe this is a bug in Pidgin because RFC 3261 [1] states:

   CSeq or Command Sequence contains an integer and a method name.  The
   CSeq number is incremented for each new request within a dialog and
   is a traditional sequence number.
   ...
   Requests within a dialog MUST contain strictly monotonically
   increasing and contiguous CSeq sequence numbers (increasing-by-one)
   in each direction (excepting ACK and CANCEL of course, whose numbers
   equal the requests being acknowledged or cancelled).

However, there is also a similar issue [2] that can be worked around by setting
pedantic=no in sip.conf.  If that doesn't work, you can give the following
(untested) patch to chan_sip.c a try:


--- chan_sip.c.orig 2013-06-19 11:44:38.0 -0400
+++ chan_sip.c  2013-06-19 11:47:22.0 -0400
@@ -28078,6 +28078,7 @@
} else if (p-icseq 
   p-icseq == seqno 
   req-method != SIP_ACK 
+  p-method != SIP_MESSAGE 
   (p-method != SIP_CANCEL || p-alreadygone)) {
/* ignore means don't do anything with it but still have to
   respond appropriately.  We do this if we receive a repeat of


Good luck and please let the list know how this works out.

[1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt
[2] https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19139

Regards,

Matthew Roth
InterMedia Marketing Solutions
Software Engineer and Systems Developer

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Simple support on Asterisk 11

2013-06-19 Thread Anthony Messina
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:11:17 AM Matthew J. Roth wrote:
 Eloi Bail wrote:
  I am trying to enable SIP SIMPLE communication in my test environment.

I use the following which semi-enables message broadcasting to multiple 
devices so a user who receives a message can reply from any of the devices.

http://messinet.com/trac/wiki/Asterisk/Message

-A

-- 
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Simple support on Asterisk 11

2013-06-19 Thread Eloi Bail
Hi,

Thanks a lot for this detailed answer :

- I managed to have it working disabling auth message request
: auth_message_requests = no in sip.conf
- pedantic=no does not resolve the issue
- reenabling  auth_message_requests = yes and removing pedantic option,
your patch in chan_sip resolves the issues !

As it looks like pidgin has an issue, I guess that we can use it as a
workaround.

I would like know to enable presence notification between each users. To
fulfill it, I am using
http://asteriskdocs.org/en/3rd_Edition/asterisk-book-html-chunk/DeviceStates_id265377.html

Am I doing it in a good way ?

Thanks !

Eloi


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Matthew J. Roth mr...@imminc.com wrote:

 Eloi Bail wrote:
 
  I am trying to enable SIP SIMPLE communication in my test environment.
 
  I have the following env :
 
  - one server (192.168.50.126) with Asterisk 11
  - 2 clients using pidgin : demo-bob and demo-alice on my 192.168.50.143
 
  I successfully had a phone call between clients.
 
  I used the following link to enable SIMPLE messaging between my clients :
 
 http://highsecurity.blogspot.ca/2012/03/asterisk-10-110-sms-messaging-or-sip.html
 
  Both users managed to register.
 
  Adding verbose on the server, I have the following traces when I send the
  message MESSAGE FROM ALICE TO BOB from demo-alice to demo-bob
 
  http://paste.fedoraproject.org/19489/37158861/
 
  As you can see I succeed to have the message sent from alice to Asterisk.
 
  When the server is trying to transmitting, I see a 401 error message.
  According to this post (
 http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?f=1t=72814 )
  the first 401 should be normal as authentication is requested.
 
  Afterwards the server emit 202 message.
 
  But demo-bob never receives a message.
  I ran wireshark on server and client. It confirms that no message is
 sent from
  Asterisk to demo-bob.
 
  Could you please give me advice ?
 
  Here are my extensions.conf and sip.conf according to the link I
 mentioned.
  http://paste.fedoraproject.org/19626/16493741/
 
  http://paste.fedoraproject.org/19627/49423137/


 Eloi,

 The trace shows that the initial MESSAGE from Alice does not include an
 Authorization header so Asterisk responds with a 401 Unauthorized.  Alice
 then
 replies with a MESSAGE with an Authorization header, but reuses the same
 CSeq
 header (CSeq: 6 MESSAGE) which causes Asterisk to ignore it as a
 retransmit:

  [Jun 18 16:49:35] DEBUG[16266] chan_sip.c: Ignoring SIP message because
 of
  retransmit (MESSAGE Seqno 6, ours 6)

 I believe this is a bug in Pidgin because RFC 3261 [1] states:

CSeq or Command Sequence contains an integer and a method name.  The
CSeq number is incremented for each new request within a dialog and
is a traditional sequence number.
...
Requests within a dialog MUST contain strictly monotonically
increasing and contiguous CSeq sequence numbers (increasing-by-one)
in each direction (excepting ACK and CANCEL of course, whose numbers
equal the requests being acknowledged or cancelled).

 However, there is also a similar issue [2] that can be worked around by
 setting
 pedantic=no in sip.conf.  If that doesn't work, you can give the
 following
 (untested) patch to chan_sip.c a try:


 
 --- chan_sip.c.orig 2013-06-19 11:44:38.0 -0400
 +++ chan_sip.c  2013-06-19 11:47:22.0 -0400
 @@ -28078,6 +28078,7 @@
 } else if (p-icseq 
p-icseq == seqno 
req-method != SIP_ACK 
 +  p-method != SIP_MESSAGE 
(p-method != SIP_CANCEL || p-alreadygone)) {
 /* ignore means don't do anything with it but still have
 to
respond appropriately.  We do this if we receive a
 repeat of

 

 Good luck and please let the list know how this works out.

 [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt
 [2] https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19139

 Regards,

 Matthew Roth
 InterMedia Marketing Solutions
 Software Engineer and Systems Developer

 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users