Re: [asterisk-users] T38 state values

2022-03-31 Thread David Cunningham
Hi Joshua, Thank you for that. In the end it seems to have been a firewall blocking the UDPTL ports. On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 at 11:15, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 7:07 PM David Cunningham < > dcunning...@voisonics.com> wrote: > >> Hi Joshua, >> >> Thanks very much for that

Re: [asterisk-users] T38 state values

2022-03-23 Thread Joshua C. Colp
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 7:07 PM David Cunningham wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > Thanks very much for that information. I guess in that case the 'not > working' scenario has a T38 state of 'T38 was negotiated and is active', > which doesn't help us find the problem much. > > In this case the T38 is

Re: [asterisk-users] T38 state values

2022-03-23 Thread David Cunningham
Hi Joshua, Thanks very much for that information. I guess in that case the 'not working' scenario has a T38 state of 'T38 was negotiated and is active', which doesn't help us find the problem much. In this case the T38 is passthrough, and in the not working scenario in a PCAP we see: PSTN ->

Re: [asterisk-users] T38 state values

2022-03-18 Thread Joshua C. Colp
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:27 AM David Cunningham wrote: > Hello, > > We have a problem where one fax ATA connected to Asterisk works, and > another ATA with the same model and firmware does not. Both are configured > to use T38. > > Basically the call comes in to Asterisk which then does a Dial