On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 03:59:22PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:58:59PM -0700, Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
Really? You have an RJ-21X block that contains both analog AND T1
wires? That's really uncommon. I hope they at least put the red
special service caps on
On Jul 11, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
I may have figured out the problem this morning, but I won't be able
to test for a few days (again, aggravating that the only T1 line I
have to test with is the live one). I noticed this morning while
telneted into the Adtran that when I
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:13:02AM -0700, Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
D-Marc that terminates the 25-pair analog line coming in (this does
not just contain our lines as I can tap into other peoples lines and
hear there conversations, love security).
The T-1's aren't on that, though, right?
On Jul 11, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:13:02AM -0700, Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
D-Marc that terminates the 25-pair analog line coming in (this does
not just contain our lines as I can tap into other peoples lines and
hear there conversations, love
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:58:59PM -0700, Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
Really? You have an RJ-21X block that contains both analog AND T1
wires? That's really uncommon. I hope they at least put the red
special service caps on the T1 wires.
Yup. I thought that pretty funny myself. 10 year
, 2008 1:05 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] US T1 Hangup Detection
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:58:59PM -0700, Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
Really? You have an RJ-21X block that contains both analog AND T1
wires? That's really uncommon. I hope they at least put
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:58:59PM -0700, Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
Really? You have an RJ-21X block that contains both analog AND T1
wires? That's really uncommon. I hope they at least put the red
special service caps on the T1 wires.
Yup. I thought that pretty funny myself. 10
Another update on the latest hookup attempt. I can make it work
reasonably well with callprogress=yes, it detects the hangup but only
after about 7-9 seconds. My config files are the same as the last
time I posted (apparently last time I wasn't waiting long enough for
callprogress to
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:48:00 -0400
From: Jason Aarons \(US\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital ISDN used Q931 messages. You should get a disconnect message
from telco on the d-channel 23.
I am pretty sure it is a T1 and not a PRI. I did try configuring it
as a PRI and it started spewing all
Is there any way you could get a cut-sheet from Verizon. I know they
are difficult to work with, but it would help to see for sure if your
circuit is indeed Loop-start. You could always try EM_wink or EM
immediate and see if there is any change.
MATT---
On 7/8/08, Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL
Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs
span=2,0,0,esf,b8zs
#
# Channel Configuration
# ~
fxsks=1-24
fxoks=25-48
So, it would appear that the lines are handled just just like normal
analog lines, the only T1 that I've delt with is setting up Adit Channel
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 10:00:08AM -0700, Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
Again, I am pretty sure T1. It is a Verizon Flex-Grow package,
The Flex-grows I've seen were indeed T1, ESF as I recall the lights on
the Adit 600 they terminated them into.
Daniel: did Verizontal supply you with a shelf? Or
On Jul 8, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
The Flex-grows I've seen were indeed T1, ESF as I recall the lights on
the Adit 600 they terminated them into.
Daniel: did Verizontal supply you with a shelf? Or just the
smartjack?
Uhhh... :) I have in my server room these things:
Just an update for the information I got from Verizon:
It is a true T1, not a PRI for sure. b8zs and esf signalling. It
is loop start with disconnect supervision (kewlstart as I understand
it). I know I had already tried kewlstart before, but I suppose it is
possible that some other
Digital ISDN used Q931 messages. You should get a disconnect message
from telco on the d-channel 23.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
Hazelbaker
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 4:39 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
We are in the process of preparing to move our Asterisk server to a
Digital T1 interface card instead of a analog card (via an Adtran
which is now connected to the T1). I did a preliminary test the other
A T1 or a PRI? Just make sure we're on the same page.
16 matches
Mail list logo
