I mean part of RTP RFC?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Bruce B bruceb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am just tweaking a pfSense router and learning lots about NAT etcI
noticed that each call uses four UDP port for RTP. Here is an example of
port for a call I made:
10200
10201
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Why are 4 ports used for a single call?
I mean part of RTP RFC?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Bruce B bruceb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am just tweaking a pfSense router and learning lots about NAT etcI
noticed that each call uses four
RTP always uses a random even numbered port, then RTCP will use the next
port, which will always be odd numbered. Symmetric RTP only needs two
ports, while asymmetric RTP uses four.
http://www.armware.dk/RFC/rfc/rfc4961.html
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Bruce B bruceb...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks guys. I am not sure whether that call was asymmetric or not but I saw
4 ports open. It could be that the other two ports were remnant of another
channel even though I doubt it.
Now, when I tried again, it is only 2 ports that is opened like you
mentioned, even RTP port, and RTP port +1.
-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bruce B
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Why are 4 ports used for a single call?
Thanks guys. I am not sure
...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Bruce B
*Sent:* Friday, January 14, 2011 2:15 PM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Why are 4 ports used for a single call?
Thanks guys. I am not sure
:
asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Bruce B
*Sent:* Friday, January 14, 2011 2:15 PM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Why are 4 ports used for a single call?
Thanks guys. I am not sure whether that call
On Friday 14 January 2011 15:12:29 Bruce B wrote:
Off topic - what is top post? I am using gmail + chrome - no ugly
Outlook.
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search.pl?query=top+posting
It's why most of the experts in here ignore your posts. If you haven't got
the good sense to follow
On 01/14/2011 4:19 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Also, to get the SIP very well as well, SIP uses both TCP/UDP 5060
right? and why are there recommendations of opening 5000-5082 UDP for
SIP along with 5060 TCP? Are there any niceties to that as well? maybe
video transmission stuff?
More likely, it's
So, simply pressing Reply and typing in the first line (using gmail webmail
without any clients) is a sin here? How is that top posting??? probably your
clients reading that way?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Tilghman Lesher tilgh...@meg.abyt.eswrote:
On Friday 14 January 2011 15:12:29
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:29:26 -0500, Tom Rymes try...@rymes.com
wrote:
On 01/14/2011 4:19 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Also, to get the SIP very well as well, SIP uses both TCP/UDP 5060
right? and why are there recommendations of opening 5000-5082 UDP for
SIP along with 5060 TCP? Are there any niceties
On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Bruce B wrote:
So, simply pressing Reply and typing in the first line (using gmail webmail
without any clients) is a sin here? How is that top posting??? probably your
clients reading that way?
It may be a sin here, but it is certainly impolite many places,
You really want to read the LONG LONG signature from some people before you
read the actual latest message? I don't know about thatI guess it's a
preference.
Back to my other questions, now that UDP is clear for me, what ports does
SIP require? TCP/UDP 5060 ? and why are there
On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Bruce B wrote:
You really want to read the LONG LONG signature from some people before you
read the actual latest message? I don't know about thatI guess it's a
preference.
Suffice it to say, Bruce, this subject has been hashed over thousands, nay,
hundreds
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Tom Rymes try...@rymes.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Bruce B wrote:
You really want to read the LONG LONG signature from some people before
you read the actual latest message? I don't know about thatI guess it's
a preference.
Suffice it to
On Jan 14, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Thanks. That is in both TCP and UDP for SIP right? or simply UDP would do it
as well? I am talking strictly in case of Asterisk.
Asterisk 1.6 and newer support SIP over TCP. Older versions were UDP only, IIRC.
Tom
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
