Not possible to have same sip usernames.
However you can create
custA_user1 == 101
custB_user1 == 101
In the dialplan context.
Mitul
On Oct 30, 2012 12:47 PM, Darin Iv adari...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I need to configure DIDs for different companies and they should reach on
different
Yes, you can do this. You should point the trunks to the right context
and done.
Op 30-10-2012 8:15, Darin Iv schreef:
Hi all,
I need to configure DIDs for different companies and they should reach
on different extension with different context. Cant we have same
extension in different
Its depends on your incoming trunks. You can define different context to
different trunks and your DID/extension will be called as per dialplan in
that parituclar context of trunk.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Henk Dick h...@osocoms.com wrote:
Yes, you can do this. You should point the
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Darin Iv adari...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I need to configure DIDs for different companies and they should reach on
different extension with different context. Cant we have same extension
in different context?
This is what we we want
Company A:
Context
I am attempting to send this again. The mail processor is interpreting the
Asterisk commands in my message as mail processor command and bouncing the
message. That's why where is junk before many of the lines below.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Darin Iv adari...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Carlos,
The idea is this. We are planning to offer customized version of Asterisk
for specialized purposes. When we offer hosted PBX, using multi-tenancy
support, it is just going to be PBX, as opposed to a fully blown IVR. It
will have automated attendant feature, but not IVR.
In contrast,
What you want can be done by OpenVBX, why dont you try exploring that model
?
Regards,
Mitul Limbani,
Chief Architech Founder,
Enterux Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
110 Reena Complex, Opp. Nathani Steel,
Vidyavihar (W), Mumbai - 400 086. India
http://www.enterux.com/
http://www.entvoice.com/
email:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Kannan vasdevelo...@gmail.com wrote:
In contrast, hosted IVR will have only one number dedicated to a business,
and the business can maintain the call flow and sound files. The system
will integrate with their CRM and offer personalized services to the
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Kannan vasdevelo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is should be possible to CONFGURE Asterisk as a multi-tenant IVR server
right? Like tweaking configuration to configure a multi-tenant PBX with
Asterisk.
I don't know why you make a distinction between a multi-tenant IVR
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 15:06 +0530, Kannan wrote:
Hi
I came across couple of pointers on the Internet regarding solutions
available for providing hosted PBX service.
1. Multiple PBXs: Using separate hardware to host each PBX. Pretty
straightforward, but no hosting company wants to use
From: Kannan vasdevelo...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:37 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-Tenant PBX with Asterisk
Thanks Leandro for your comments
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Subject*: Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-Tenant PBX with Asterisk
Thanks Leandro for your comments.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Leandro Dardini ldard...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/7/30 Kannan vasdevelo...@gmail.com
Hi
I came across couple of pointers
--
*From*: Kannan vasdevelo...@gmail.com
*Sent*: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:37 AM
*To*: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Subject*: Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-Tenant PBX with Asterisk
Thanks Leandro for your comments.
On Mon, Jul 30
2012/7/30 Kannan vasdevelo...@gmail.com
Hi
I came across couple of pointers on the Internet regarding solutions
available for providing hosted PBX service.
1. Multiple PBXs: Using separate hardware to host each PBX. Pretty
straightforward, but no hosting company wants to use it.
2.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Kannan vasdevelo...@gmail.com wrote:
2. Multi-tenant PBX: Configuring multiple PBXs within the same instance of
Asterisk. I.e. partitioning a single instance of Asterisk into multiple
PBXs by way of configurations, using unique landing context for each tenant.
Thanks Leandro for your comments.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Leandro Dardini ldard...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/7/30 Kannan vasdevelo...@gmail.com
Hi
I came across couple of pointers on the Internet regarding solutions
available for providing hosted PBX service.
1. Multiple PBXs:
Thanks Carlos, it is good to hear from one who is in a similar business.
Are you getting use of ARA too in similar hosted PBX offerings?
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Carlos Alvarez car...@televolve.comwrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Kannan vasdevelo...@gmail.com wrote:
2.
I don't know what ARA is. We use just bare Asterisk, no GUI, and from the
context it seems that's related to a GUI. We have no problem doing a
config reload during production hours. We never do a full reload, just the
relevant module (SIP, dialplan, voicemail, etc).
I don't believe there is
ARA is an acronym for Asterisk Realtime Architecture and is a different way
to keep configuration files in asterisk. Instead of reading configuration
from plain files at startup, asterisk read them from database, in realtime.
This mean, if you need to add a peer, you drop a new line in the
We tried realtime and decided it wasn't for us. Never got it into
production, so I can't say much about it.
--
Carlos Alvarez
Sent from my Nexus 7
On Jul 30, 2012 10:25 PM, Leandro Dardini ldard...@gmail.com wrote:
ARA is an acronym for Asterisk Realtime Architecture and is a different
way to
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 21:45 -0300, Juan wrote:
damn, advertisements everywhere, also in non commercial mailing lists...
ITSPTEC.COM seems don't understand what a NON-COMMERCIAL DISCUSSION is
about
I will never buy anything from people like you who don't seems to
understand so basic
On 22 Mar 2011, at 01:09, Outback Dingo wrote:
Even worse... now it smells of a scam
At least their website isn't hideous...
Oh..wait.. ;)
S
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to
damn, advertisements everywhere, also in non commercial mailing lists...
ITSPTEC.COM seems don't understand what a NON-COMMERCIAL DISCUSSION is
about
I will never buy anything from people like you who don't seems to
understand so basic things
@itsptec.com should be blacklisted...
On
Thanks John Bower and ITSPTEC.COM, you've made it easy for me to not feel
bad about never using your products...
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Juan hardwareven...@gmail.com wrote:
damn, advertisements everywhere, also in non commercial mailing lists...
ITSPTEC.COM seems don't understand
great way to kill sales for your company idiot.!
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:38 PM, john.bo...@itsptec.com wrote:
We are glad to announce that ITSPtec now offers a complete ITSP system for
Asterisk with powerful routing engine, billing System- including invoicing,
configuration, phone
Even worse... now it smells of a scam
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: ITSPTEC.COM
Created on: 27-Jan-11
Expires on: 27-Jan-12
Last Updated on: 27-Jan-11
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Outback Dingo
Oh my...
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.comwrote:
Even worse... now it smells of a scam
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: ITSPTEC.COM
Created on: 27-Jan-11
Expires on: 27-Jan-12
Last
I listened to your email using DriveCarefully and will respond as soon as I can.
Download DriveCarefully for free at www.drivecarefully.com
--
Sent from my BlackBerry®
Senior Support Engineer
US Numbers: 561-886-0664
Nicaragua Mobile: +505.8488.6876
--
On 11-01-27 11:41 AM, Amardeep Rana wrote:
Please give idea for Multi tenant with Trixbox or elastix.
http://astbook.asteriskdocs.org
--
Paul Belanger
Digium, Inc. | Software Developer
twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode)
Check us out at: http://digium.com http://asterisk.org
Oh man, I'm sorry, but I laughed so hard at that response, I think I
peed a little :P
To the original poster, Mr Belanger is most definitely being VERY kind
compared to what some people might have responded with
A little effort (and showing that you have put in that effort) goes a
long way
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of UxBoD
Sent: Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:16
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-Tenant Parking
Should that not say parkinglot
Have you looked at this?
http://www.google.com/#q=app_valetparking
I have - but would rather use the inbuilt functionality if possible before
resorting to third-party code...
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO RECIPIENT
Computer viruses - It is your responsibility to scan this email and any
” as designed
when the Park() function is used instead.
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of UxBoD
Sent: Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:16
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users
At 23:57 1/11/2010, Michael Wyres wrote:
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary=_004_11FDCFCDD2B4B0439630AEC725D1635D1BAC56FDC4ssyd10exinter_;
type=multipart/alternative
Has anyone managed to get multi-parking lot call
parking working correctly? Ive had
Should that not say parkinglot and not parkinglog in features.conf?
-
Sent from Zimbra and my iPhone!
SplatNIX IT Services :: Innovation through collaboration
On 12 Jan 2010, at 06:03, Michael Wyres mwy...@cdm.com.au wrote:
Has anyone managed to get
I added some examples a while back to the extensions.conf.sample and the
voicemail.conf.sample code to show how to support distinct domains for voice
mail contexts... which was a big obstacle to multi-tenancy... otherwise, you
couldn't have individual greetings, etc.
For places (like
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 19:55 +, Gavin Spurgeon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List,
What I hope is a simple question...
As the subject states, I would like to know if anyone has setup a
Multi Tenant Asterisk Server ?
If so, what would I need to do to get
On 17:54, Fri 13 Nov 09, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 19:55 +, Gavin Spurgeon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List,
What I hope is a simple question...
As the subject states, I would like to know if anyone has setup a
Multi
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 00:30 +0100, Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 17:54, Fri 13 Nov 09, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 19:55 +, Gavin Spurgeon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List,
What I hope is a simple question...
As the
On 18:55, Fri 13 Nov 09, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 00:30 +0100, Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 17:54, Fri 13 Nov 09, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 19:55 +, Gavin Spurgeon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Oops! Thought I had changed to address! My apologies - John
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 13:29 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. My apologies for troubling the developer list as an end
user but we were not able to resolve this issue on the user list and it
is smelling like a possible
Jonathan Thurman jthurma...@gmail.com writes:
Sorry, I am relatively new to the Asterisk project and probably don't
fully understand how the release cycle for this project works. Are you
saying that the minor releases are only for security bugs?
Minor releases aren't only for security bugs,
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 07:17 -0700, Jonathan Thurman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53 PM, John A. Sullivan III
jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 02:17 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. With the assistance of very helpful
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:42 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 07:17 -0700, Jonathan Thurman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53 PM, John A. Sullivan III
jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 02:17 -0400, John A. Sullivan
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 02:17 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. With the assistance of very helpful folks, our brand new
multi-tenant setup seems to be working smoothly from start to finish
with just a bump or two. The biggest is parking. Now that we got most
kinks worked out,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53 PM, John A. Sullivan III
jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 02:17 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. With the assistance of very helpful folks, our brand new
multi-tenant setup seems to be working smoothly from start to
This has been fixed in the 1.6.1 SVN, and you will have to back
port a patch until these changes are rolled into another release. I was
disappointed that more bug fixes were not included in 1.6.1.1.
-Jonathan
Asterisk 1.6.1.1 was released
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 07:17 -0700, Jonathan Thurman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53 PM, John A. Sullivan III
jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 02:17 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. With the assistance of very helpful
This has been fixed in the 1.6.1 SVN, and you will have to back port a
patch until these changes are rolled into another release. I was
disappointed that more bug fixes were not included in 1.6.1.1.
-Jonathan
Asterisk 1.6.1.1 was released for a security issue, AST-2009-001. Why
would
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Gavin Henry wrote:
Dear all,
I'm currently researching options for a MT asterisk gui/system for a
small business centre that will have 12 units in it. Each unit will be
configured for one extension.
The system there will have a max of 12 concurrent calls to PSTN
provided
We can put about 9/10 calls using SIP/gsm through our BT Business Network
ADSL package connection (832kbit upstream, £65/month) before you notice the
quality starting to drop, but you could always get two connections and
bond them together into one using openvpn or some other method if you
wanted
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Geraint Lee wrote:
We can put about 9/10 calls using SIP/gsm through our BT Business Network
ADSL package connection (832kbit upstream, £65/month) before you notice the
quality starting to drop, but you could always get two connections and
bond them together into one using
2009/3/17 Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Gavin Henry wrote:
Dear all,
I'm currently researching options for a MT asterisk gui/system for a
small business centre that will have 12 units in it. Each unit will be
configured for one extension.
The system
2009/3/17 Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Geraint Lee wrote:
We can put about 9/10 calls using SIP/gsm through our BT Business Network
ADSL package connection (832kbit upstream, £65/month) before you notice
the
quality starting to drop, but you could always
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Gavin Henry wrote:
2009/3/17 Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Gavin Henry wrote:
When budgets tight - I've deployed a lot of Grandstream phones - might give
you a bit more breathing space if you use (eg) GXP280's for the client
phones
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Gavin Henry wrote:
2009/3/17 Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Geraint Lee wrote:
I know of a local company who're regularly putting 20 concurrent calls over
the same broadband setup using G729...
Yeah, we use g.729 ourselves too.
The
A2billing is a good fit for that then. Yeah, voipon. Thanks for the
input Gordon. Maybe worth hooking up offline if we're doing similar
stuff.
Gavin.
On 17/03/2009, Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Gavin Henry wrote:
2009/3/17 Gordon Henderson
Yeah, I've experienced that. But what can you do other than stick woth
a fat codec.
On 17/03/2009, Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Gavin Henry wrote:
2009/3/17 Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Geraint Lee wrote:
I know
For MT check out Thirdlane's MT PBX:
http://www.thirdlane.com/products/thirdlane-pbx-mte
I use the PBX Manager which it's based on and it works very well.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Gavin Henry wrote:
Yeah, I've experienced that. But what can you do other than stick woth
a fat codec.
It's tricky. I've been experimenting looking at the possibilitys of
using different codecs based on destination, so UK landlines stick to g729
as teh transcode to alaw
Hi Mujtaba,
We have a multi-tenant version of our Asterisk based management and end-user
software called Thirdlane PBX Manager. You can see a demo of a single-tenant
version on our web site http://www.thirdlane.com/pbxmanager.htm the
multi-tenant adds tenant and DID management, and allows to
You could use a prefix-based agent numbering scheme, like Agent/XXYYY
where XX is your customer code and YYY their own agent number. When
showing activity to a customer, you strip the XX part or you may leave it
alone, as it makes no big confusion to the client.
Yours,
l.
On Fri, 18
I had the exact same dilemma and switched to using AddQueueMember/
RemoveQueueMember instead of using agents. This solved my problem.
- Waldo
On Nov 17, 2005, at 7:13 PM, snacktime wrote:
I'd like some feedback on my solution so far for using queues in a
multi tenant configuration. For
On 11/17/05, Waldo Rubinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had the exact same dilemma and switched to using AddQueueMember/RemoveQueueMember instead of using agents. This solved my problem.
Thanks!! That looks like a better solution all the way around.
Chris
Why cant you use operator1 and operator2
On 5/3/05, Daniel Salama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to setup a multi-tenant configuration of * and have the
following question:
In extensions.conf, there is a [global] section that I would normally
use to define global variables for my
65 matches
Mail list logo
