Re: [Astlinux-users] Enhancement for Adaptive Ban

2014-09-25 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
Armin, It would be easy enough for us to add the "Not a local domain" match for the adaptive ban, our only concern is to make sure this isn't a common misconfiguration case and cause more problems than it helps. Would it be possible to capture a SIP packet for each of these cases ? For exampl

Re: [Astlinux-users] Enhancement for Adaptive Ban

2014-09-25 Thread Armin Tüting
> Hi Armin, Hi Lonnie, > 1) Your first "Failed to authenticate device" can't be banned since there is > no "real" IP address logged, only what is in the sip: header, which can't be > trusted. Ok - what other option are available. ... > Are you seeing this from bad guys ? Or could this be a mi

Re: [Astlinux-users] Enhancement for Adaptive Ban

2014-09-25 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
Hi Armin, 1) Your first "Failed to authenticate device" can't be banned since there is no "real" IP address logged, only what is in the sip: header, which can't be trusted. 2) Your second "Not a local domain" could be banned, as this occurs with a common class of registration errors in Asteris

[Astlinux-users] Enhancement for Adaptive Ban

2014-09-25 Thread Armin Tüting
Hello, could we get additional rules added to Adaptive Ban so that these two would match >Sep2422:10:48 astlinux local0.notice asterisk[14935]: > NOTICE[14958][C-004d]: chan_sip.c:25639 in > handle_request_invite:Failedtoauthenticate