Some more info in case anyone else hits this.
"Unable , to create channel of type 'Zap' (cause 66 - Channel not
implemented)"
I hit this error again setting up another system. So, not only does it
appear if you have more daughter boards than you have configured in
zaptel.conf; you will also get i
Hi,
I've spent the past couple of weeks working on a project I've given
myself to get Astlinux 0.6.1 running on a Dell PowerEdge 860. 0.4.8 ran
fine from the generic i586 image, installed on a 4GB CF connected via a
CF-SATA adaptor. The Dell is SATA throughout, although I think the
secondary chann
>I can concur with Darrick says, from a practical sense as well. I treat it
>like a toaster... I pull the plug all the time on test boxes. I probably
>have not done so while a vm was being captured, but I've never seen a
>problem with fs consistency on restart.
Appreciate the feedback guys! I am a
; Hope this helps,
>
>
> Ron Byer Jr.
> NetWeave Integrated Solutions, Inc.
> +1.732.786.8830 x120
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrick Hartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 12:48 PM
> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
>
: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] 0.6.1
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> I don't see the kd getting that much use that would make that an issue.
Most
>> of the traffic that it sees (voicemails) will still take 7-10 years to
wear
>> out the CF card.
>
&g
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> I don't see the kd getting that much use that would make that an issue. Most
>> of the traffic that it sees (voicemails) will still take 7-10 years to wear
>> out the CF card.
>
> Ron,
> With your setup, what happens if the power is disrupted w/o a clean shutdown?
> Will
>I don't see the kd getting that much use that would make that an issue. Most
>of the traffic that it sees (voicemails) will still take 7-10 years to wear
>out the CF card.
Ron,
With your setup, what happens if the power is disrupted w/o a clean shutdown?
Will the system simply restart and continu
Wondering if there has been any progress examining the geni586 img?
John Novack
Darrick Hartman wrote:
Ok. Now we're getting somewhere. There may be an issue with the
geni586 image. I'll try to take a look over the weekend.
Darrick
David Kerr wrote:
I'll weigh in here and observe that I
al Message-
From: Lonnie Abelbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 October 2008 10:23 AM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] 0.6.1
Clara,
I have my net5501's setup exactly as Ron's.
Assuming a SanDisk CF card of 1G, or larger (2G ultra II my c
Clara
>
> From: Ron Byer Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 October 2008 9:34 AM
> To: 'AstLinux Users Mailing List'
> Subject: [Astlinux-users] 0.6.1
>
> Greetings –
>
> For what it is worth. I’ve been successful with 0.6.1 with the
> following e
ubject: Re: [Astlinux-users] 0.6.1
Ron,
What sizes are you making your hda2 and hda3? And do you know which one is
meant for voicemail??
Rgds,
Clara
_
From: Ron Byer Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 October 2008 9:34 AM
To: 'AstLinux Users Mailin
Ron,
Nice submission.
You can eliminate the 'reboot' after the 'genunion', but of course it
does no harm.
Lonnie
On Oct 20, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Ron Byer Jr. wrote:
> Greetings –
>
> For what it is worth. I’ve been successful with 0.6.1 with the
> following environment:
>
> -Sandisk 4 GB CF i
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:54 PM
To: 'AstLinux Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] 0.6.1
>- genkd /dev/hda3, yes to use existing partition
Ron,
I have been lurking in here a while as I plan
7;
Subject: [Astlinux-users] 0.6.1
Greetings -
For what it is worth. I've been successful with 0.6.1 with the following
environment:
-Sandisk 4 GB CF in a net5501
- 0.6.1 image written to the CF card using physdiskwrite, then installed into
net5501
- booted into astlinux, with /dev
>- genkd /dev/hda3, yes to use existing partition
Ron,
I have been lurking in here a while as I plan to migrate to a 5501 as well.
What are any caveats to using the CF as the kd? I thought that was bad as the
writes were high enough to wear it out? Should it not be on a usb stick?
Thanks for the
Greetings -
For what it is worth. I've been successful with 0.6.1 with the following
environment:
-Sandisk 4 GB CF in a net5501
- 0.6.1 image written to the CF card using physdiskwrite, then installed
into net5501
- booted into astlinux, with /dev/hda1 partition
- entered fdisk, created
Ok. Now we're getting somewhere. There may be an issue with the
geni586 image. I'll try to take a look over the weekend.
Darrick
David Kerr wrote:
> I'll weigh in here and observe that I was unable to create a vmware
> virtual disk using the geni586 image file... I had to use the runnix
> i
I'll weigh in here and observe that I was unable to create a vmware virtual
disk using the geni586 image file... I had to use the runnix image file and
then copy the geni586 build into the os subdirectory.
David
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, John Novack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Not Mark
Not Mark here, but SPECIFICALLY the geni586 image file will not install
properly for me.
Some time back we had an off list exchange, then you got busy with money
jobs and it got left in the dust.
I will be away until Sunday, but if you can't find my response, and get
different results, let me kn
Mark,
Specifically (I mean exactly) which img.gz (note not tar.gz) file is
wrong? Anything with an img.gz should be an image file.
I'm going to have to call you on this because I just gunzip'ed each of
the img.gz files that are posted on my site and I can guarantee that
they are all image fil
This is what I've been trying to say for a week now.
The .img.tgz file on Darrick's website isn't an image file but rather a
collections of the manual install files.
Mark
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 10:40 -0400, John Novack wrote:
>
> IT Services wrote:
> > Using physdiskwrite gives me a disk which
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:16 PM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] 0.6.1 MODOPTS ignored ?
I was seeing that last night with # 2010. I figured that it was the fix
I committed as 2009... but if you all were running 2005 and seeing it
as well, then it
I was seeing that last night with # 2010. I figured that it was the fix
I committed as 2009... but if you all were running 2005 and seeing it
as well, then it clearly wasn't that.
I'm running 2014 right now, and it's booting reliably.
Can someone else give it a try?
-Philip
Tom Chadwin wro
I have the same kernel panic at the same stage, after kernel memory freed.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Chris Abnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting… my trunk 1945 runs perfectly.. however I compiled trunk 2005
> and get a kernel panic during the actual astlinux image boot.. so n
ECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:31 AM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] 0.6.1 MODOPTS ignored ?
Using physdiskwrite gives me a disk which results in a kernel panic on boot.
Running astinstall from the livecd gives me an unbootable partition (though
IT Services wrote:
> Using physdiskwrite gives me a disk which results in a kernel panic on
> boot.
I get the same result attempting to install the img file using dd to a
CF card.
I have no idea why the one step install doesn't work, and it seems
others do it with success, and no general inter
Using physdiskwrite gives me a disk which results in a kernel panic on boot.
Running astinstall from the livecd gives me an unbootable partition (though
fdisk claims its bootable flag is set).
Still failing to get Astlinux running ona single HD system.
Tom
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Chris
Services [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] 0.6.1 MODOPTS ignored ?
>> Do you consider that the the problem with MODOPTS not being picked up
>> is a bug which needs to be raised?
&
>> Do you consider that the the problem with MODOPTS not being picked up
>> is a bug which needs to be raised?
> It is a bug. Philip has committed a fix to trunk which I have not had time
to pickup and use in the 0.6 branch.
I know how busy people are, but is there any timescale on this? I still
Darrick
please see comments below
>>
>> /oldroot/mnt/ does not exist on my system. Are you suggesting that I
>> should create /oldroot/mnt/asturw/etc/modprobe.conf? What is the best
>> practice way of adding to modprobe.conf.
>
> If /oldroot/mnt does not exist on your file system, then somethin
Martin Rogers wrote:
>
> Darrick Hartman wrote:
>> Martin Rogers wrote:
>>> Darrick
>>>
>>> thanks for the reply. I tried editing /etc/modprobe.conf originally
>>> (setting the filesystem to RW etc) but the changes do not make it past a
>>> reboot. I also tried storing one on the keydisk in case t
Darrick Hartman wrote:
> Martin Rogers wrote:
>> Darrick
>>
>> thanks for the reply. I tried editing /etc/modprobe.conf originally
>> (setting the filesystem to RW etc) but the changes do not make it past a
>> reboot. I also tried storing one on the keydisk in case this could be
>> used to replac
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:02 -0500, Darrick Hartman wrote:
> 1,000,000/300 = many more moons than either of us will be alive.
Well, actually its something like 7 years but I take your point.
OK, you've convinced me.
Now all I have to do is work out how to install the thing from
the .img.tgz f
Martin Rogers wrote:
> Darrick
>
> thanks for the reply. I tried editing /etc/modprobe.conf originally
> (setting the filesystem to RW etc) but the changes do not make it past a
> reboot. I also tried storing one on the keydisk in case this could be
> used to replace the etc one - without success,
Mark Phillips wrote:
> Are the system writes limited? Not if your system is actively doing
> voicemail etc and you have a pretty steady flow of calls coming and
> going. I get maybe 15-20 VM's a day and about 60 calls. My VM's produce
> 3 types of file as well as index's etc. When I delete the mess
Mark Phillips wrote:
> I think that the OS is NOT picking up the USB stick for it's own use.
>
> I'll try the /dev/hda approach rather than /dev/sda but I thought the
> whole point of using s CF card and USB combo was that the CF card was
> write cycle limited as well as pretty slow.
>
You real
>Well, so much for USB support in the NET4801.
>
>The stick is detected on boot up but not mounted.
>
>If I unplug it and then plug it back in after bootup when the system is
>running then it gets detected and mounted as /dev/sda1. However, this
>still doesn't allow me to make any writes other than
Well, so much for USB support in the NET4801.
The stick is detected on boot up but not mounted.
If I unplug it and then plug it back in after bootup when the system is
running then it gets detected and mounted as /dev/sda1. However, this
still doesn't allow me to make any writes other than direct
I think that the OS is NOT picking up the USB stick for it's own use.
I'll try the /dev/hda approach rather than /dev/sda but I thought the
whole point of using s CF card and USB combo was that the CF card was
write cycle limited as well as pretty slow.
Have I spotted an "undocumented feature" h
I've just rebooted for the n'th time and careful scrolling back through
the screen buffer shows the USB stick gets detected but somehow it's not
mounted. Oddly though it works in other machines.
I'm gonna try a different stick.
Mark
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 10:10 -0400, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Hi D
On Oct 14, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> pbx ~ # findfs LABEL=asturw
> findfs: Unable to resolve 'LABEL=asturw'
> pbx ~ #
Try:
pbx ~ # findfs LABEL=ASTURW
Lonnie
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin
Mark,
Mark Phillips wrote:
> Hi Darrick,
>
> Yes, I have rebooted a number of times.
>
> I get this when I issue your command;
>
> pbx ~ # findfs LABEL=asturw
> findfs: Unable to resolve 'LABEL=asturw'
> pbx ~ #
>
> I'm running a 1gb CF card and a 512mb USB stick in a NET4801.
If findfs
Hi Darrick,
Yes, I have rebooted a number of times.
I get this when I issue your command;
pbx ~ # findfs LABEL=asturw
findfs: Unable to resolve 'LABEL=asturw'
pbx ~ #
I'm running a 1gb CF card and a 512mb USB stick in a NET4801.
The genunion script appears to run correctly. It doesn't bail
Mark Phillips wrote:
> OK, I have runnix installed and also AstLinux too but I can't get it to
> write anything down.
>
> I've run genunion and it makes a keydisk of sorts but doesn't mount it
> anywhere so as to write to it (that I can see anyhow). Whenever I try to
> change the root password it
OK, I have runnix installed and also AstLinux too but I can't get it to
write anything down.
I've run genunion and it makes a keydisk of sorts but doesn't mount it
anywhere so as to write to it (that I can see anyhow). Whenever I try to
change the root password it fails to write to /etc/shadow.
W
Darrick
thanks for the reply. I tried editing /etc/modprobe.conf originally
(setting the filesystem to RW etc) but the changes do not make it past a
reboot. I also tried storing one on the keydisk in case this could be
used to replace the etc one - without success, it does not get copied over.
Wh
Can someone please pick up commit # 2009 and test it?
Thanks.
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Seems like /etc/modprobe.conf should be a link to /tmp/etc/modprobe.conf ...
>
>
> Darrick Hartman wrote:
>
>> Mart,
>>
>> This isn't an area that I've had to use so we may need to adjust it.
>> Kristian
Seems like /etc/modprobe.conf should be a link to /tmp/etc/modprobe.conf ...
Darrick Hartman wrote:
> Mart,
>
> This isn't an area that I've had to use so we may need to adjust it.
> Kristian may need to shed a little light on this too.
>
> MODOPTS are supposedly set as follows: (from /etc/rc)
>
Mart,
This isn't an area that I've had to use so we may need to adjust it.
Kristian may need to shed a little light on this too.
MODOPTS are supposedly set as follows: (from /etc/rc)
if [ -n "$MODOPTS" ]; then
for i in $MODOPTS; do
MOD=`echo $i | cut -d: -f1`
OPT=`echo $i
Hi
This is a followup to a recent thread on modprobe which did not conclude
in any resolution.
It appears that setting MODOPTS in /mnt/kd/rc.conf are ignored.
I am using the astlinux-0.6.1-via.img.gz image.
I have set the following line in the /mnt/kd/rc.conf to set the opermode
to UK
and to tu
Hi
I have resolved this issue now, and thought I would share it in case
anyone hits this.
After the upgrade all the original files were restored to the keydisk
except for the rc.conf and the zaptel.conf which I created by hand.
When I configured the latter I setup the file as :
fxsks=3
fxsks=4
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Martin Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have just upgraded a Wyse Winterm box which was running an old
> Astlinux (Asterisk v1.2) to 0.6.1-via.
>
> The box is connected to two PSTN lines via a TDM400 card and has worked
> fine.
>
> I backed up all the con
Hi
I have just upgraded a Wyse Winterm box which was running an old
Astlinux (Asterisk v1.2) to 0.6.1-via.
The box is connected to two PSTN lines via a TDM400 card and has worked
fine.
I backed up all the config from my key disk and did a physdiskwrite of
the new image onto the CF. I then scratc
53 matches
Mail list logo
