Ah, got it:
Index: package/busybox/busybox.mk
===
--- package/busybox/busybox.mk (revision 1441)
+++ package/busybox/busybox.mk (working copy)
@@ -68,6 +68,10 @@
$(SED) "s/^.*CONFIG_LFS.*/CONFIG_LFS=n/;" $(BUSYBOX_DIR)/.conf
Darrick Hartman (lists) wrote:
> Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>> Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 9, 2007 12:45 AM, Philip Prindeville
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
I started to use "which" as a template... seemed simple enough...
Things like "*", "
Darrick Hartman (lists) wrote:
> Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>> Let's give it a whirl:
>> ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/package_vim.tar.gz
>>
>
> I committed this to trunk but it's not quite right yet.
>
What's missing (so I get it right next time)?
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
>> On Dec 9, 2007 12:45 AM, Philip Prindeville
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I started to use "which" as a template... seemed simple enough...
>>>
>>> Things like "*", "^", "$", etc. are handy... as are .,+10s/match/subst/
>>> (i.e.
Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2007 12:45 AM, Philip Prindeville
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I started to use "which" as a template... seemed simple enough...
>>
>> Things like "*", "^", "$", etc. are handy... as are .,+10s/match/subst/
>> (i.e. dot-relative addressing)... using h
Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2007 12:45 AM, Philip Prindeville
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I started to use "which" as a template... seemed simple enough...
>>
>> Things like "*", "^", "$", etc. are handy... as are .,+10s/match/subst/
>> (i.e. dot-relative addressing)... using h
On Dec 9, 2007 12:45 AM, Philip Prindeville
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I started to use "which" as a template... seemed simple enough...
>
> Things like "*", "^", "$", etc. are handy... as are .,+10s/match/subst/
> (i.e. dot-relative addressing)... using h for left, j for down, k for
> up, l f
Darrick Hartman (lists) wrote:
> Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>> Is there a brief description of what's needed to add a new package to
>> the environment?
>>
>> I'd like to use "vim" instead of the Busybox version of vi [sic]. Not
>> having regex's is just too painful. ;-)
>>
>
> What ar
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Is there a brief description of what's needed to add a new package to
> the environment?
>
> I'd like to use "vim" instead of the Busybox version of vi [sic]. Not
> having regex's is just too painful. ;-)
What are you attempting to do with vi that you can't do? I'
Is there a brief description of what's needed to add a new package to
the environment?
I'd like to use "vim" instead of the Busybox version of vi [sic]. Not
having regex's is just too painful. ;-)
-Philip
-
SF.Net email
10 matches
Mail list logo
