art...@djhsolutions.com]
> Sent: 17 February 2010 17:59
> To: Tom Chadwin; AstLinux Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NICs and 0.7-0.6.8 regression
>
> Tom,
>
> When you upgraded from your previous version, did you also
> look at the changes to config files?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Lonnie Abelbeck [mailto:li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com]
>> Sent: 17 February 2010 14:19
>> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
>> Cc: Tom Chadwin
>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NICs and 0.7-0.6.8 regression
>>
>> Po
sers Mailing List
> Cc: Tom Chadwin
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NICs and 0.7-0.6.8 regression
>
> Possibly, first 1.4.30 needs to be officially released, then tested.
>
> Darrick makes the release decisions.
>
> Lonnie
>
>
> On Feb 17, 2010, at 7:59 AM, To
Tom,
I would not try going back to 0.6 to test. It's not worth the trouble.
Michael built an 0.7 test image with asterisk 1.4.28 and the problem when away.
Hopefully 1.4.30 will fix the problem in the coming days.
Lonnie
On Feb 17, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Tom Chadwin wrote:
> Hello all
>
> In or
-
>> From: Lonnie Abelbeck [mailto:li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com]
>> Sent: 17 February 2010 13:37
>> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
>> Cc: Tom Chadwin
>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NICs and 0.7-0.6.8 regression
>>
>> Tom,
>>
>> I would not try
Thanks, Lonnie. So is there an anticipated 0.7.1 with 1.4.30?
Tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Lonnie Abelbeck [mailto:li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com]
> Sent: 17 February 2010 13:37
> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
> Cc: Tom Chadwin
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users]
And a specific quick question: which Asterisk version was in 0.6.8? Was it
1.4.28?
Thanks
Tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Chadwin [mailto:nnpait.servi...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 17 February 2010 10:12
> To: 'AstLinux Users Mailing List'
> Subject: NICs and 0.7-0.6.8 regression
>
Hello all
In order to try to track down an issue which seems to have arisen with
forwarding an incoming DAHDI call to an outgoing IAX trunk, I was about to
revert a 0.7 box to 0.6.8. With the appearance of 70-persistent-net.rules,
and the apparent re-ordering of NICs in my net5501 with berofix (81
