Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT Loopback

2016-05-27 Thread Michael Knill
Sorry Lonnie yes I didnt think about it obviously but yes a handy plugin. Regards Michael Knill -Original Message- From: Lonnie Abelbeck Reply-To: AstLinux List Date: Saturday, 28 May 2016 at 12:19 AM To: AstLinux List Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT Loopback Michael, The

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT Loopback

2016-05-27 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
Michael, The NAT Loopback plugin only apples to internal NAT'ed servers where internal clients can access those servers by the public IP rather than the local private IP. Useful for mobile devices that may hop between the public and private side of the network. In the XMPP case it is not NAT'

[Astlinux-users] NAT Loopback

2016-05-26 Thread Michael Knill
Hi group I was just looking at the firewall plugins and I noticed NAT Loopback. I recently set up XMPP for a customer to be used internally and externally. I set it up using SRV records pointing internal and external which was a good learning experience but could have I just turned on NAT Loopba

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-12 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
Hi Tom, IIRC, your original task was to use Remote Desktop (RDP) from a remote location and access a PC on a LAN whose default gateway was down. You proved NAT forwarding on the AstLinux would not work since the PC's default gateway was not the AstLinux box. The above could be done by enablin

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-12 Thread Tom Chadwin
> You may also need to have your gateway/router device have a route to the OpenVPN subnet that identifies the Astlinux box as the gateway for the OpenVPN subnet. But of course the situation I am trying to handle is when the main gateway is down. Will clients still e able to route to the VPN subnet

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-12 Thread Tom Chadwin
t' Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule Tom, You may also need to have your gateway/router device have a route to the OpenVPN subnet that identifies the Astlinux box as the gateway for the OpenVPN subnet. Darrick -Original Message- From: Tom Chadwin [mailto:nnpait.servi...@googl

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-11 Thread Darrick Hartman
10:35 AM To: 'AstLinux Users Mailing List' Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule Hi Lonnie To clarify: if I set the Astlinux box up as a VPN server (probably OpenVPN road warrior), and I connect to that remotely, will I be able to reach other machines on the remote LAN, even though t

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-11 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
ux box > set as their default gateway/route? > > Thanks > > Tom > > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Chadwin [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 10 December 2012 16:29 > To: 'AstLinux Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [Astlinux-u

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-11 Thread Tom Chadwin
-Original Message- From: Tom Chadwin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 10 December 2012 16:29 To: 'AstLinux Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule Understood. No, we have no VPNs set up on the Astlinux box - the firewall on the main line (which was down)

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-10 Thread Tom Chadwin
Abelbeck [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 10 December 2012 16:27 To: AstLinux Users Mailing List Cc: Tom Chadwin Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule Tom, I see what you are trying to do, but the source address of your NAT EXT-LAN packet to the PC will be the address the PC sends the reply

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-10 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
:[email protected]] > Sent: 10 December 2012 15:47 > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List > Cc: Tom Chadwin > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule > > Hi Tom, > > The Firewall tab's "NAT EXT:" entry specifies which external IP the rule > applies to,

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-10 Thread Tom Chadwin
com] Sent: 10 December 2012 15:47 To: AstLinux Users Mailing List Cc: Tom Chadwin Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule Hi Tom, The Firewall tab's "NAT EXT:" entry specifies which external IP the rule applies to, by default it is 0/0 which is any external IP. You probably

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-10 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
Hi Tom, The Firewall tab's "NAT EXT:" entry specifies which external IP the rule applies to, by default it is 0/0 which is any external IP. You probably only have one external IP address. So, something like this would work for RDP -- NAT EXT-LAN Protocol: TCP Src: 0/0 Port: 3389 Dst: 192.16

[Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-10 Thread Tom Chadwin
Hello all Just lost main connection to a remote site, but the Astlinux box (also on the LAN) on its own line is up and reachable. I'm therefore trying to set up a port forward on the Astlinux box to allow me to RDP from here to a Windows box on the LAN. Have added a "NAT EXT>LAN" rule. This bring

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT to LAN routing issue after 0.6 to 0.7 upgrade

2010-05-04 Thread Guy Neale
Thanks Lonnie worked a treat like the firewall plugins, make's traffic prioritisation/configuration a breeze Your web interface is excellent, maybe in a future release you could add tooltips (with the ability to turn them on/off ) eg explaining how to enter multiple DNS servers etc etc I

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT to LAN routing issue after 0.6 to 0.7 upgrade

2010-05-04 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
On May 4, 2010, at 7:20 PM, Guy Neale wrote: > Lonnie > > I'm embarrassed (sorry for waisting your time) > > Enabling masquerading(NAT) via external interface(s): ppp+ > Adding (internal) host(s): 10.8.0.0/24 > (ppp+) Forwarding(NAT) TCP port(s) 0/0:42377 to 10.8.0.184:42377 > Security is ENFO

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT to LAN routing issue after 0.6 to 0.7 upgrade

2010-05-04 Thread Guy Neale
Lonnie I'm embarrassed (sorry for waisting your time) Enabling masquerading(NAT) via external interface(s): ppp+ Adding (internal) host(s): 10.8.0.0/24 (ppp+) Forwarding(NAT) TCP port(s) 0/0:42377 to 10.8.0.184:42377 Security is ENFORCED for external interface(s) in the FORWARD chain May 05 10

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT to LAN routing issue after 0.6 to 0.7 upgrade

2010-05-04 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
Guy, Does the script conclude with: "firewall: ** All firewall rules applied **" ? If not, the iptables error should be logged. The NAT EXT->LAN rule should work, unless the input values in the web interface are not proper. Clearly, moving any of your special /etc/modprobe.conf to /etc/modpro

[Astlinux-users] NAT to LAN routing issue after 0.6 to 0.7 upgrade

2010-05-04 Thread Guy Neale
Hi List I recently upgraded from AstLinux 0.6 to 0.7.1 and have have found my static NAT to LAN routing doesn't seem to be working (as configured in firewall rules in the web interface). I've upgraded Arno-firewall upgrade via the web interface. All other routing seems to be working OK My a li

Re: [Astlinux-users] nat

2008-11-22 Thread Philip Prindeville
ch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 12:35 PM > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] nat > > I am experimenting with AstLinux 0.6.1 on a net5501 but the topology > is different in the my pbx is on the NATed LAN with most (but

Re: [Astlinux-users] nat

2008-11-21 Thread Ron Byer Jr.
sage- From: Tod Fitch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 12:35 PM To: AstLinux Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] nat I am experimenting with AstLinux 0.6.1 on a net5501 but the topology is different in the my pbx is on the NATed LAN with most (but not all

Re: [Astlinux-users] nat

2008-11-21 Thread Tod Fitch
I am experimenting with AstLinux 0.6.1 on a net5501 but the topology is different in the my pbx is on the NATed LAN with most (but not all) of the phones. I have not seen an issue with the net5501 failing to handle the RTP stream, my issue is that on ENUM calls Asterisk is attempting a "nat

[Astlinux-users] nat

2008-11-21 Thread Ron Byer Jr.
I've started using the astlinux 0.6 on a net5501 in earnest recently, and we have found ourselves in a world of hurt from a NAT perspective. We have a few phones behind their own soho firewalls, and the pbx is in the clear. 1-way audio, no-way audio for these NATted phones seems to be the deal. Th

[Astlinux-users] NAT/RTP issue since upgrade.

2008-10-26 Thread Ron Byer
Greetings - I have a peculiar problem which I was wondering if anyone had some insight into. I have an asterisk server with 2 NICs (1 extern IP, one intern IP). Asterisk V1.4.19 I have a set of SIP phones on the internal LAN which houses the intern IP of the pbx. I also have 3 SIP phones th

Re: [Astlinux-users] Nat

2008-03-09 Thread Philip Prindeville
EXTIF=eth1 EXTIP=x.x.x.x EXTNM=y.y.y.y EXTGW=g.g.g.g INTIF=eth0 INTIP=192.168.1.1 INTNM=255.255.255.0 Thomas Bodekær Thomsen wrote: > Hi > > I would like to do the following setup... Is it posssible with astlinux ?? > > My internal net is 192.168.1.0/24 i would like to put that on eth0 (or

[Astlinux-users] Nat

2008-03-09 Thread Thomas Bodekær Thomsen
Hi I would like to do the following setup... Is it posssible with astlinux ?? My internal net is 192.168.1.0/24 i would like to put that on eth0 (or whaterver) I have bought an extra DSL connection for voip only and would like to plug it in to eth1 Is it possible for astlinux to do that