On 12/12/10 11:48 AM, David Kerr wrote:
>
>
> I've slowly been getting patches upstream to Apache, APR, Proftpd,
> Firefox, Thunderbird, Cyrus, Openssh, Sendmail, Wget, libcurl, etc. to get
> applications to use the correct settings. This is the end-game.
>
> In fact, if you send me the
First, I don't object to doing it. I object it doing it in the wrong place
(and hence mixing up two separate operations into one amorphous blob) and in
the wrong way (based on address alone, instead of address *and* port).
And I object to ignoring majority consensus as well as ownership.
Mark
Philip...
Not sure that I understand why you object so strongly... why is it not
okay to designate a specific host IP as being low priority when it is okay
to designate by port number?
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Philip Prindeville <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Classifica
Classification and shaping are separate functions, and as such Arno and I agree
these should be separate plugins.
If Lonnie wants to combine them in Astlinux then that's his prerogative, but
making this change upstream to my plugin without asking me is egregious and not
consistent with ownershi
All,
With full knowledge that it's poor form to post "me too!" messages to a
list. Sorry... I simply can't help myself in this instance:
I must echo your thanks to Lonnie and the wonderful team of AstLinux
developers.
Dan
On 12/2/2010 9:15 AM, David Kerr wrote:
I thought I would reply
I thought I would reply to the list here with an update. Lonnie has
assisted me over the last 24 hours and provided a solution with the traffic
shaper plugin. Hopefully the feature will make it into a future public
version of AstLinux.
I wanted to add how truly impressed I am with the traffic sha
Hi David,
Good question. To be clear, the traffic shaper plugin only effects traffic
traversing the external interface, it has no effect on local to local traffic.
Given that, you pose an interesting idea, such as adding a traffic shaper
config variable like SHAPER_P2P_LOCAL_HOSTS="", while doa
I've been looking at the traffic shaper plugin hoping to improve performance
of my WAN connection. I can see how to configure it to prioritize traffic
by port number, but is there a way to have it prioritize by IP address?
What I want to do is designate a particular device inside my LAN as having
