Its now in my upgrade procedure so I don't __
Thanks again.
Regards
Michael Knill
On 8/9/20, 5:53 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2020, at 2:29 PM, Michael Knill
wrote:
>
> Thanks Lonnie for the info.
>
> So if things are running fine now then there shouldn'
> On Sep 7, 2020, at 2:29 PM, Michael Knill
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Lonnie for the info.
>
> So if things are running fine now then there shouldn't be too much risk
> waiting until I do my next upgrade (1.3.10 or later) before I upgrade Runnix?
Sounds like a good plan to me. Just don't forget
Thanks Lonnie for the info.
So if things are running fine now then there shouldn't be too much risk waiting
until I do my next upgrade (1.3.10 or later) before I upgrade Runnix?
Regards
Michael Knill
On 7/9/20, 11:39 pm, "Lonnie Abelbeck" wrote:
Also keep in mind AstLinux 1.3.8 and older
Also keep in mind AstLinux 1.3.8 and older will only upgrade RUNNIX to
runnix-0.5.11.
AstLinux 1.3.10 and newer will use runnix-0.6.1 (or later)
Lonnie
> On Sep 7, 2020, at 8:12 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>
> While Michael Keuter is correct, keeping up with latest RUNNIX is a good
> idea, a
While Michael Keuter is correct, keeping up with latest RUNNIX is a good idea,
an upgrade has never been required for a new AstLinux release.
The advantage of the latest RUNNIX is the e2fsprogs and other tools are updated
in case RUNNIX is needed to rescue a disk. When RUNNIX 0.6.2 (dev only
c
Most of my sites are on 1.3.7.1 so only up to 0.5.11.
1.3.10 went to 0.6.1 which I assume is a necessary upgrade.
Regards
Michael Knill
On 7/9/20, 10:24 pm, "Michael Keuter" wrote:
> Am 07.09.2020 um 14:12 schrieb Michael Knill
:
>
> All my devices are 64 bit ☹
>
> Reg
> Am 07.09.2020 um 14:12 schrieb Michael Knill
> :
>
> All my devices are 64 bit ☹
>
> Regards
> Michael Knill
Shame on you :-).
> On 7/9/20, 9:50 pm, "Michael Keuter" wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 07.09.2020 um 13:19 schrieb Michael Knill
>> :
>>
>> Hi Group
>>
>> I have just realised that I h
All my devices are 64 bit ☹
Regards
Michael Knill
On 7/9/20, 9:50 pm, "Michael Keuter" wrote:
> Am 07.09.2020 um 13:19 schrieb Michael Knill
:
>
> Hi Group
>
> I have just realised that I have not been checking for Runnix Bootloader
upgrades when doing a firmware upg
> Am 07.09.2020 um 13:19 schrieb Michael Knill
> :
>
> Hi Group
>
> I have just realised that I have not been checking for Runnix Bootloader
> upgrades when doing a firmware upgrade and I have quite a few different
> versions out there.
> E.g. some of my original systems are running runnix
Hi Group
I have just realised that I have not been checking for Runnix Bootloader
upgrades when doing a firmware upgrade and I have quite a few different
versions out there.
E.g. some of my original systems are running runnix-0.4-6956
All systems seem to be running fine but just wondering what
10 matches
Mail list logo
