Darrick Hartman wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2009, at 5:07 PM, John Novack wrote:
>
>> May I assume this firewall module is not usable with boards that
>> only have a single Ethernet port?
>>
>>
>> John Novack
>
> Basically, yes 2+ interfaces are required.
Lonnie,
While not possible with the current A
Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2009, at 5:07 PM, John Novack wrote:
>
>> May I assume this firewall module is not usable with boards that
>> only have a single Ethernet port?
>>
>>
>> John Novack
>
> Basically, yes 2+ interfaces are required.
Lonnie,
While not possible with the current A
No, you may not. :-)
Hosts also need firewalling.
-Philip
John Novack wrote:
> May I assume this firewall module is not usable with boards that only
> have a single Ethernet port?
>
>
> John Novack
>
>
> Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Darrick Hartman (lists) wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Keuter wrot
On Apr 27, 2009, at 5:07 PM, John Novack wrote:
> May I assume this firewall module is not usable with boards that
> only have a single Ethernet port?
>
>
> John Novack
Basically, yes 2+ interfaces are required.
The devel's had talked about installing a dummy interface to always
allow firew
May I assume this firewall module is not usable with boards that only
have a single Ethernet port?
John Novack
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Darrick Hartman (lists) wrote:
Michael Keuter wrote:
-Philip
A problem in Astlinux is, that before you can add an a
Darrick Hartman (lists) wrote:
> Michael Keuter wrote:
>
> -Philip
>
A problem in Astlinux is, that before you can add an attacker to the
blocklist (when you see the attacks in realtime), the "/var/"
partition will be full within 2-3 minutes just because of
Michael Keuter wrote:
-Philip
>>> A problem in Astlinux is, that before you can add an attacker to the
>>> blocklist (when you see the attacks in realtime), the "/var/"
>>> partition will be full within 2-3 minutes just because of the growing
>>> syslog :-(. And from that point in time yo
>Michael Keuter wrote:
>>> Dan Ryson wrote:
All,
It appears we're getting pounded by a kiddy script that's trying to
guess passwords. It's generating ~1,350 password guesses and log
entries per minute (see example below). Although I have strong
passwords,
Michael Keuter wrote:
>> Dan Ryson wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> It appears we're getting pounded by a kiddy script that's trying to
>>> guess passwords. It's generating ~1,350 password guesses and log
>>> entries per minute (see example below). Although I have strong
>>> passwords, I'd like to bl
>Dan Ryson wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> It appears we're getting pounded by a kiddy script that's trying to
>> guess passwords. It's generating ~1,350 password guesses and log
>> entries per minute (see example below). Although I have strong
>> passwords, I'd like to block this effort by blocking th
Outstanding. I'll give that a try.
Thanks Darrick and Philip.
~ D
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
Dan Ryson wrote:
All,
It appears we're getting pounded by a kiddy script that's trying to
guess passwords. It's generating ~1,350 password guesses and log
entries per minute (see example bel
Dan Ryson wrote:
> All,
>
> It appears we're getting pounded by a kiddy script that's trying to
> guess passwords. It's generating ~1,350 password guesses and log
> entries per minute (see example below). Although I have strong
> passwords, I'd like to block this effort by blocking this IP add
Dan,
If you're using Arno's fw, you can configure blocked IP addresses very
easily. Those blocks will survive an upgrade.
That feature should be present in the web interface, but can be done
from the command line as well.
Darrick
Dan Ryson wrote:
> All,
>
> It appears we're getting pounded
13 matches
Mail list logo
