Darrick Hartman (lists) wrote:
Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Darrick Hartman wrote:
Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007, at 2:57 PM, John Novack wrote:
When one uses the web editing of rc.conf, and ignores or forgets
the instruction elsewhe
Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Darrick Hartman wrote:
>
>> Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>>> On Dec 29, 2007, at 2:57 PM, John Novack wrote:
>>>
When one uses the web editing of rc.conf, and ignores or forgets
the instruction elsewhere to set the filesystem first to rw, i
On Dec 29, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Darrick Hartman wrote:
> Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>> On Dec 29, 2007, at 2:57 PM, John Novack wrote:
>>
>>> When one uses the web editing of rc.conf, and ignores or forgets
>>> the instruction elsewhere to set the filesystem first to rw, it
>>> seems one is able to bumb
Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2007, at 2:57 PM, John Novack wrote:
>
>> When one uses the web editing of rc.conf, and ignores or forgets
>> the instruction elsewhere to set the filesystem first to rw, it
>> seems one is able to bumble right in, successfully edit and save
>> the file wi
I agree as to what SHOULD be done, but my real point was that the web
editing is there and allowed, and novice users can end up in trouble by
doing so.
Since I don't even know what is involved to put in any sort of safety
net, I can't say what should be done.
Gray out the function, change to rw
On Dec 29, 2007, at 2:57 PM, John Novack wrote:
> When one uses the web editing of rc.conf, and ignores or forgets
> the instruction elsewhere to set the filesystem first to rw, it
> seems one is able to bumble right in, successfully edit and save
> the file without first setting to rw, then
