Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS problem

2009-10-14 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
On Oct 14, 2009, at 6:07 AM, Tom Chadwin wrote: > The one issue while I was using the setup page was that the HTTP > redirect, which is meant to forward you back to the setup page once > the box has rebooted, redirected too early, so I got a page not found. > I clicked back, and then clicked the F

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS problem

2009-10-14 Thread Tom Chadwin
> >I followed this process (though the page's layout is broken > in IE8/PC > >which makes it somewhat difficult to read without viewing > the source). > >I don't believe it tells you manually to visit the setup page twice. > >The one issue while I was using the setup page was that the HTTP > >redi

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS problem

2009-10-14 Thread Michael Keuter
>Hi Michael > >I followed this process (though the page's layout is broken in IE8/PC >which makes it somewhat difficult to read without viewing the source). >I don't believe it tells you manually to visit the setup page twice. >The one issue while I was using the setup page was that the HTTP >redir

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS problem

2009-10-14 Thread Tom Chadwin
Hi Michael > >I have installed the geni586 image of 0.6.7, and then run > >pbx/admin/setup.php, selecting the defaults for persistent storage. > >Files I write to /mnt/kd persist across reboots. However, > changes made > >via the Edit tab of the Astlinux GUI (selecting files which do not > >exist

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS problem

2009-10-14 Thread Michael Keuter
>Hello all > >I have installed the geni586 image of 0.6.7, and then run >pbx/admin/setup.php, selecting the defaults for persistent storage. >Files I write to /mnt/kd persist across reboots. However, changes made >via the Edit tab of the Astlinux GUI (selecting files which do not >exist on /mnt/kd)

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS problem

2008-08-01 Thread Manuel Domínguez
ombre de Darrick Hartman (lists) Enviado el: viernes, 01 de agosto de 2008 16:16 Para: AstLinux Users Mailing List Asunto: Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS problem Manuel wrote: > Hello everyone, > > With an Alix board using runnix-serial and net5501 images from > Darrick, no problems

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS problem

2008-08-01 Thread Darrick Hartman (lists)
Manuel wrote: > Hello everyone, > > With an Alix board using runnix-serial and net5501 images from > Darrick, no problems appears. The only warning is: > > Checking asturw filesystem > fsck: /etc/fstab: No such file or directory > fsck: fsck.ext2: No such file or directory > fsck: wait: no mo

Re: [Astlinux-users] Unionfs

2008-05-03 Thread Darrick Hartman (lists)
David Kerr wrote: > Can someone explain unionfs to me. I understand that it enables you to > write to the astlinux system disk, I'm guessing by saving the changes > onto the hda designated for use by unionfs. But my question is more > specific to astlinux... is using unionfs an alternative to

Re: [Astlinux-users] Unionfs

2008-05-03 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
On May 3, 2008, at 7:52 PM, David Kerr wrote: > Can someone explain unionfs to me. I understand that it enables > you to write to the astlinux system disk, I'm guessing by saving > the changes onto the hda designated for use by unionfs. But my > question is more specific to astlinux... is

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2008-01-27 Thread Darrick Hartman
Philip Prindeville wrote: >> Philip, >> >> This is not related to what Fred is asking. Fred wasn't talking about >> /oldroot/cdrom remaining mounted. He was talking about var (which does >> not reside on unionfs). >> > > I know he wasn't... but since it came up in the example, I thought I

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2008-01-27 Thread Philip Prindeville
Darrick Hartman (lists) wrote: > Philip Prindeville wrote: > >> Fred wrote: >> >>> Lonnie >>> >>> At 12:31 26/01/2008 -0600, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: >>> >>> Well, the unionfs "rw" overlay to the "ro" base mount is CF based, but most any files that are written-to on a co

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2008-01-27 Thread Fred
At 16:15 27/01/2008 -0600, Darrick Hartman (lists) wrote: >This is not related to what Fred is asking. Fred wasn't talking >about /oldroot/cdrom remaining mounted. He was talking about var (which >does not reside on unionfs). Yup. I was just wondering how the UnionFS worked, and whether writi

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2008-01-27 Thread Darrick Hartman (lists)
Philip Prindeville wrote: > Fred wrote: >> Lonnie >> >> At 12:31 26/01/2008 -0600, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: >> >>> Well, the unionfs "rw" overlay to the "ro" base mount is CF based, but >>> most any files that are written-to on a constant basis are mounted as >>> "tmpfs" which is a RAM based f

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2008-01-27 Thread Philip Prindeville
Fred wrote: > Lonnie > > At 12:31 26/01/2008 -0600, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: > >> Well, the unionfs "rw" overlay to the "ro" base mount is CF based, but >> most any files that are written-to on a constant basis are mounted as >> "tmpfs" which is a RAM based filesystem. >> > > OK. So am I

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2008-01-26 Thread Fred
At 20:48 26/01/2008 -0600, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: >Great question, and I am no unionfs expert by any stretch, I'm learning >by doing, but this is how I understand things. Thanks for the explanation. Makes perfect sense. Thankfully, I found some C samples, so I should be able to write CLI-based

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2008-01-26 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
On Jan 26, 2008, at 8:15 PM, Fred wrote: > Lonnie > > At 12:31 26/01/2008 -0600, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: >> Well, the unionfs "rw" overlay to the "ro" base mount is CF >> based, but >> most any files that are written-to on a constant basis are >> mounted as >> "tmpfs" which is a RAM based fi

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2008-01-26 Thread Fred
Lonnie At 12:31 26/01/2008 -0600, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: >Well, the unionfs "rw" overlay to the "ro" base mount is CF based, but >most any files that are written-to on a constant basis are mounted as >"tmpfs" which is a RAM based filesystem. OK. So am I right in thinking that for development,

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2008-01-26 Thread Fred
Hello At 12:31 26/01/2008 -0600, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: >With unionfs, a person *could* write to /etc/foo 100's of times a second, >which would have failed without unionfs, but knowing this would not >happen on a normal astlinux setup should be comforting. Yes. I'll just to hope that I don't

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2008-01-26 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
On Jan 26, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Fred wrote: > Hello > > I just added asturw=/dev/hda2 to the .run.conf file, and I can > successfully > write to files. > > One thing though: This means that if copy an application that wasn't > massaged at compile-time to either never write or perform unfrequent >

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS again wins 1-0

2008-01-01 Thread Jonathan GF
Okay, this example is good enough to let me understand what you intend to transmit. I'll try it "this new year" :) Regards, Jonathan GF On Jan 1, 2008 12:51 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonathan, > > This should be quite easy. > > For example, if you want to add German sou

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS again wins 1-0

2007-12-31 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
Jonathan, This should be quite easy. For example, if you want to add German sound files, mkdir /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/de then copy your sound files to "/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/de/" (via ftp or such) Your German sound files will now be on flash thanks to unionfs. Your changed unionfs files

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS again wins 1-0

2007-12-31 Thread Jonathan GF
Lonnie, thank you very much for your thoughts. Let me explain totally my "problem". AstLinux comes with some directoryes in the stat(ic) part. Some even don't exists (please correct me if i'm wrong). The sounds comes in english and with 1.2 format. In 1.4 format the sounds should be in /language

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS again wins 1-0

2007-12-31 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
On Dec 31, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Jonathan GF wrote: > Hi all, > > when i thought my knowledge of UnionFS was almost none i was wrong. > IS NONE :/ > > I tried to replicate the behavior i got from asterisk-beta-1445 > into asterisk-beta-1459 but i couldn't. I don't understand nothing. > Hope som

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2007-12-29 Thread Jonathan GF
Hi Kris, even if at the boot i saw 1 error or warning at the end the system mounted the partiion on the usb stick in /oldroot/mnt/asturw/ and copied a directory "/lib/ with some kernel things. I assume the partition is mounted, not sure if in the correct path because i don't know almost none of

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2007-12-29 Thread Jonathan GF
Hey Kris, thanks for the clue ;) Cheers! Jonathan GF On Dec 29, 2007 3:21 AM, Kristian Kielhofner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 28, 2007 8:45 AM, Jonathan GF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Darrick > > > > i'm trying to use the unionfs asturw but i cannot mount it. > > > > AstLinux imag

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2007-12-28 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
On Dec 28, 2007 8:45 AM, Jonathan GF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Darrick > > i'm trying to use the unionfs asturw but i cannot mount it. > > AstLinux image found! > Configuring for unionfs... > mount: mounting /dev/sda5 on /mnt/asturw failed > Copying AstLinux files to RAM... > scsi 0:0:0:0: Direc

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2007-12-28 Thread Jonathan GF
Darrick i'm trying to use the unionfs asturw but i cannot mount it. AstLinux image found! Configuring for unionfs... mount: mounting /dev/sda5 on /mnt/asturw failed Copying AstLinux files to RAM... scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access LEXARJD FIREFLY 1100 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0 CCS SCSI device sda: 3

Re: [Astlinux-users] UnionFS

2007-12-27 Thread Darrick Hartman
Jonathan GF wrote: > Hi Devels, > > i would like to know what is the approach for use UnionFS and its script > genunion. I would like to know if the process takes care of the files > that might exist on disk or not. > > The best question is, genunion *should be* generated in the CF or in the >

Re: [Astlinux-users] Unionfs improvements

2007-12-25 Thread Philip Prindeville
Darrick Hartman (lists) wrote: > As a special Christmas present, I've made several improvements/changes > to the unionfs usage in Astlinux. The segfault messages should now be > gone. So far these changes have been made in the asterisk-beta branch > and in trunk. I'll port these changes over