Hey everyone,
I hope this is the right mlist to post my question to. If not, please
redirect me to the correct one. I recently tried async for websockets.
Here's the question:
Looking at the following code, is there a better way to do it?
I personally find it much too much code for its purp
Cory and I are the owners and neither of us are that active in this space,
so it would probably be best if someone else took over.
___
Async-sig mailing list -- async-sig@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to async-sig-le...@python.org
https://mail.p
On 7/13/21 12:06 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Cory and I are the owners and neither of us are that active in this space, so
it would
> probably be best if someone else took over.
I can do it. I'm going for the most mailing lists owner/moderator badge. ;-)
--
~Ethan~
Why not have two independent coroutines that each loop forever, handling
events from their respective queues?
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:04 PM Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I hope this is the right mlist to post my question to. If not, please
> redirect me to the correct one. I recent
There's no interdependency in your code snippet.
If that's really the case, then why not refactor it into something like:
async def notify_all():
async for x in queue:
await handle_notification(x)
async def receive_all():
async for x in receive:
await handle_reception(x)
