On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > The kind of alternative I had in mind for a neutral location is > setting an attribute with an agreed upon name on a module in the > standard lib, perhaps something like > `contextvars.current_async_library_cvar` to use your naming. This is > analogous to agreeing on a file name to store information of a certain > kind in a repository root, like .travis.yml, package.json, or > pyproject.toml. It's light-weight and doesn't require any > infrastructure or tying to a particular package on PyPI.
Yeah, it'd be possible. I guess it just didn't seem worth the extra complication. -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ Async-sig mailing list Async-sig@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/async-sig Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
