Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath10k: add accounting for the extended peer statistics

Hi Christian, > On Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:13:39 PM CET Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: > > I am also thinking, as of now there is not much use in appending > > the extended peer stats (which gets periodically ) to the linked list > > '>debug.fw_stats.peers_extd)' and should we get rid of

Re: ath10k firmware sends probes on DFS channels without radar detection

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:53:47PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Tosoni wrote: > > > Thanks for the suggestion, I already tried something like this in > > > wmi.c, with the same result: > > > > > > - Before patching the firmware scans DFS channels actively (with > > probes). > > > > > > - After patching, the

RE: ath10k firmware sends probes on DFS channels without radar detection

> -Message d'origine- > De : Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com] > Envoyé : jeudi 15 décembre 2016 17:33 > À : Jean-Pierre Tosoni; 'Jouni Malinen' > Cc : linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; ath10k@lists.infradead.org > Objet : Re: ath10k firmware sends probes on DFS channels without

Re: [RFC v2 11/11] ath10k: Added sdio support

On 12/15/2016 05:40 PM, Valo, Kalle wrote: > Erik Stromdahl writes: > >> Initial HIF sdio/mailbox implementation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Erik Stromdahl >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig |6 + >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath10k: add accounting for the extended peer statistics

Hello Shafi, On Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:13:39 PM CET Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: > I am also thinking, as of now there is not much use in appending > the extended peer stats (which gets periodically ) to the linked list > '>debug.fw_stats.peers_extd)' and should we get rid of the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath10k: add accounting for the extended peer statistics

Hi Christian, I am also thinking, as of now there is not much use in appending the extended peer stats (which gets periodically ) to the linked list '>debug.fw_stats.peers_extd)' and should we get rid of the below (and the required cleanup as well) list_splice_tail_init(_extd,

Re: ath10k firmware sends probes on DFS channels without radar detection

On 12/15/2016 07:22 AM, Jean-Pierre Tosoni wrote: Jouni, Thanks for the suggestion, I already tried something like this in wmi.c, with the same result: - Before patching the firmware scans DFS channels actively (with probes). - After patching, the firmware scans DFS channels passively *until*

RE: ath10k firmware sends probes on DFS channels without radar detection

Jouni, Thanks for the suggestion, I already tried something like this in wmi.c, with the same result: - Before patching the firmware scans DFS channels actively (with probes). - After patching, the firmware scans DFS channels passively *until* any beacon is received on the DFS channel. When