On 2020-05-06 21:11, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
[...]
static inline struct htt_stats_conf_item *htt_stats_conf_next_item(
@@ -1674,7 +1674,7 @@ struct htt_tx_fetch_ind {
__le16 num_resp_ids;
__le16 num_records;
struct htt_tx_fetch_record records[0];
- __le32
allmodconfig
powerpc allnoconfig
i386 randconfig-a005-20200507
i386 randconfig-a004-20200507
i386 randconfig-a001-20200507
i386 randconfig-a002-20200507
i386 randconfig-a003-20200507
Hello,
An unlock may be missing on line 4613.
julia
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 20:37:55 +0800
From: kbuild test robot
To: kbu...@lists.01.org
Cc: l...@intel.com, Julia Lawall
Subject: [ath6kl:pending 90/99]
defconfig
powerpc allyesconfig
powerpc rhel-kconfig
powerpc allmodconfig
powerpc allnoconfig
i386 randconfig-a005-20200507
i386 randconfig-a004-20200507
i386
writes:
> Yes, The change you did is correct and better.
Thanks for checking.
> So should I be sending a v3 for this patch ?
No need, the patch with this change is now in my pending branch and I'll
apply it to ath-next it in the next few days.
--
Hi Kalle,
Yes, The change you did is correct and better.
So should I be sending a v3 for this patch ?
Thanks,
Rakesh Pillai.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kalle Valo
> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 11:37 AM
> To: Rakesh Pillai
> Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org;
Rakesh Pillai writes:
> Currently when the sending of any management pkt
> via wmi command fails, the packet is being unmapped
> freed in the error handling. But the idr entry added,
> which is used to track these packet is not getting removed.
>
> Hence, during unload, in wmi cleanup, all the
