[PATCH mac80211-next] ath10k: fix unhandled switch value warning

2020-07-30 Thread Thomas Pedersen
Cited commit introduced the following warnings: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c: In function 'chan_to_phymode': drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c:558:3: warning: enumeration value 'NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_1' not handled in switch [-Wswitch] 558 | switch (chandef->width) { |

BUSINESS PROPOSAL

2020-07-30 Thread James kenneth
Hello, Apply for a loan, at a 3% interest rate. Do you need a personal loan? Do you need a business loan? Do you need a consolidation loan? Do you need a secure loan? Do you need an unsecured loan? Do you need a mortgage loan? Do you need a pay off debt loan?

Re: [RFC 1/2] devlink: add simple fw crash helpers

2020-07-30 Thread Johannes Berg
Hi, Sorry ... long delay. > > The reason I'm asking is that it's starting to sound like we really > > ought to be implementing devlink, but we've got a bunch of > > infrastructure that uses the devcoredump, and it'll take time > > (significantly so) to change all that... > > In devlink world

Re: [PATCH 1/2] nl80211: vendor-cmd: qca: add dynamic SAR power limits

2020-07-30 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 12:26 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > So to me it feels like the best solution forward is to go with the > > > vendor API, do you agree? We can, of course, later switch to the common > > > API if we manage to create one which is usable for everyone. But why wouldn't we try

Re: [PATCH 1/2] nl80211: vendor-cmd: qca: add dynamic SAR power limits

2020-07-30 Thread Johannes Berg
On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 18:32 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > I haven't quite reached the 3 month lag on the prior replies here :) But I did, almost ;-) > I do want to see this question resolved somehow, or else we'll be > dragging along out-of-tree patches for...(counts on fingers)...4 > different

[PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-07-30 Thread Alvin Šipraga
This reverts commit 2dc016599cfa9672a147528ca26d70c3654a5423. Per Atheros documentation to manufacturers, the EEPROM regulatory domain code 0x0 must always map to "US". In particular, it should not map to a custom world regulatory domain. For references, see [1] and [2] below. Furthermore,

Re: [RFC 1/7] mac80211: Add check for napi handle before WARN_ON

2020-07-30 Thread Johannes Berg
On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 21:49 +0530, Rakesh Pillai wrote: > We do have the usage of napi_gro_receive and netif_receive_skb in mac80211. > /* deliver to local stack */ > if (rx->napi) > napi_gro_receive(rx->napi, skb); > else >