On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix
>
> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
>
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 9:10 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tom Rix
>
> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
> early acks.
>
> clang ha
On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 20:21 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > From: Tom Rix
> > >
> > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> > > I am wondering if the change could be
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Rix
> >
> > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> > normal patch per file about 10
On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix
>
> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
> early a
From: Tom Rix
This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
early acks.
clang has a number of useful, new warnings see
https://clang.llv
