On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 3:14 AM Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On 5/14/2024 10:45 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:43 PM Jeff Johnson
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/11/2024 3:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> If ath10k_snoc is built-in, while Qualcomm remoteprocs are built as
> >
On 5/15/2024 12:27 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
But James is reporting[1] that 802.11w is working for him. So it doesn't
seem to be completely broken even if you are having problems and
removing the 802.11w support from the driver doesn't sound right.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ce0e2043-5085-4dd6
On 5/14/2024 10:45 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:43 PM Jeff Johnson
> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/11/2024 3:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> If ath10k_snoc is built-in, while Qualcomm remoteprocs are built as
>>> modules, compilation fails with:
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gn
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:43 PM Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On 5/11/2024 3:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > If ath10k_snoc is built-in, while Qualcomm remoteprocs are built as
> > modules, compilation fails with:
> >
> > /usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.o: in
> >
Eric Park writes:
> On 5/6/2024 6:04 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> (...)
>> This is of course just a theory. I don't know how familiar you are with
>> 802.11 protocols but that is something to investigate. Unfortunately I
>> have very little time for ath10k nowadays.
>
> Not very familiar with 802.1
On 5/11/2024 3:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> If ath10k_snoc is built-in, while Qualcomm remoteprocs are built as
> modules, compilation fails with:
>
> /usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.o: in
> function `ath10k_modem_init':
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sn
