Re: Frames acknowledged and silently discarded in firmware

Hi Adrian, On 3/13/18, 5:21 PM, "Adrian Chadd" wrote: HI, What were the mac addresses? Why were they so dissimilar? The addresses on the pre-cal files were 12:34:56:78:90:12 We changed them to manufacturer assigned macs. Thanks! Javier -adrian

Re: Frames acknowledged and silently discarded in firmware

Thomas, On 3/13/18, 5:53 PM, "Thomas Pedersen" <tho...@eero.com> wrote: Javier, On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Javier Cardona <jcard...@fb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We have resolved this issue. I'm sharing the details

Re: Frames acknowledged and silently discarded in firmware

MAC-FILTER-ADDR-U16 0x We would probably be still trying to solve this if Ben Greear did not point us in the right direction. Cheers, Javier On 2/7/18, 2:15 PM, "Javier Cardona" <jcard...@fb.com> wrote: Hi, We have observed a problem where, under

Re: Frames acknowledged and silently discarded in firmware

efore the driver is ready to pass them up. -a On 7 February 2018 at 14:15, Javier Cardona <jcard...@fb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We have observed a problem where, under certain conditions, the ath10k firmware will acknowledge frames but

Frames acknowledged and silently discarded in firmware

Hi, We have observed a problem where, under certain conditions, the ath10k firmware will acknowledge frames but not send them up to the driver. Frames are sent by a mesh access point (MAP1) to a second mesh AP (MAP2) at MCS 9/NSS-3, which at that distance is probably marginal. Since frames