Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2022-09-19 Thread Sebastian Gottschall
Am 20.09.2022 um 01:42 schrieb Sergey Ryazanov: Hello, I would like to add my 2c. On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 8:25 PM Tim Harvey wrote: I'm not clear if there are many other cards that have this same issue. The list of cards with unprogrammed regdomain can be extended with several relatively

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2022-09-19 Thread Sergey Ryazanov
Hello, I would like to add my 2c. On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 8:25 PM Tim Harvey wrote: > I'm not clear if > there are many other cards that have this same issue. The list of cards with unprogrammed regdomain can be extended with several relatively modern models: * MikroTik R11e-5HacD (QCA9882

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2022-09-19 Thread Tim Harvey
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 2:57 PM Brian Norris wrote: > > Hi Cale, > > I meant to respond a while back, but didn't get around to it, sorry. > In case it's still helpful: > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 3:52 PM Cale Collins wrote: > > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 11:16 AM Cale Collins wrote: > > > I'm

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2022-08-30 Thread Brian Norris
Hi Cale, I meant to respond a while back, but didn't get around to it, sorry. In case it's still helpful: On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 3:52 PM Cale Collins wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 11:16 AM Cale Collins wrote: > > I'm experiencing an issue very similar to this. The regulatory domain > >

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2022-05-11 Thread Cale Collins
Adding Kalle, I got his address wrong the first time. On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 11:16 AM Cale Collins wrote: > > Hello Brian and Kalle, > > I'm experiencing an issue very similar to this. The regulatory domain > settings wouldn't allow me to create an AP on 5ghz bands on kernels > newer than 5.10

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2022-05-09 Thread Cale Collins
Hello Brian and Kalle, I'm experiencing an issue very similar to this. The regulatory domain settings wouldn't allow me to create an AP on 5ghz bands on kernels newer than 5.10 when using a WLE900VX (QCA9984) radio. I bisected the kernel and ultimately landed on the regression that Brian

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2022-04-25 Thread Brian Norris
Hi Patrick, On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 3:52 AM Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > This revert is in fact causing problems on my machine. I have a QCA9984, > which exports two network interfaces. While I was able to still use one > of both NICs for 2.4GHz, I couldn't really use the other card to set up > a

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2022-04-23 Thread Patrick Steinhardt
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:57:18AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > This reverts commit 2dc016599cfa9672a147528ca26d70c3654a5423. > > Users are reporting regressions in regulatory domain detection and > channel availability. > > The problem this was trying to resolve was fixed in firmware anyway: >

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2022-03-07 Thread Kalle Valo
Brian Norris wrote: > This reverts commit 2dc016599cfa9672a147528ca26d70c3654a5423. > > Users are reporting regressions in regulatory domain detection and > channel availability. > > The problem this was trying to resolve was fixed in firmware anyway: > > QCA6174 hw3.0: sdio-4.4.1: add

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-12-21 Thread spark...@gmx.de
Am 30.10.20 um 14:23 schrieb Alvin Sipraga: Hi, On 10/30/20 8:20 AM, Jouni Malinen wrote: So the issue is in not being able to operate an AP on the 5 GHz band? That sounds like the expected behavior for any device that has not been calibrated and provisioned for a specific country where

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-12-21 Thread spark...@gmx.de
On 10/30/20 8:20 AM, Jouni Malinen wrote: > So the issue is in not being able to operate an AP on the 5 GHz band? > That sounds like the expected behavior for any device that has not > been calibrated and provisioned for a specific country where > regulatory rules allow operation on the 5 GHz

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-12-19 Thread Julian Phillips
://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2020-October/012049.html . Kind regards, Julian ​ From: ath10k on behalf of Félix Sipma Sent: October 30, 2020 8:51 AM To: Jouni Malinen Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"  

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-10-30 Thread Alvin Sipraga
Hi, On 10/30/20 8:20 AM, Jouni Malinen wrote: > So the issue is in not being able to operate an AP on the 5 GHz band? > That sounds like the expected behavior for any device that has not > been calibrated and provisioned for a specific country where > regulatory rules allow operation on the 5 GHz

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-10-30 Thread Félix Sipma
On 2020-10-30 09:20+0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 4:06 PM Félix Sipma wrote: I made a detailed report, with dmesg outputs of different kernel/firmware-atheros and wireless-regdb combinations at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970679 So the issue is in

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-10-30 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 4:06 PM Félix Sipma wrote: > I made a detailed report, with dmesg outputs of different > kernel/firmware-atheros and wireless-regdb combinations at > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970679 So the issue is in not being able to operate an AP on the 5 GHz

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-10-29 Thread Félix Sipma
Hi, Thanks for your detailed answer. I made a detailed report, with dmesg outputs of different kernel/firmware-atheros and wireless-regdb combinations at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970679 Massimo Maggi pointed me to this ath10k issue on the last message. Regards, On

[PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-10-22 Thread Félix Sipma
Hello, Sorry if I break the thread, I'm not subscribed and do not have access to the message-id. I noticed the last message about this issue was on August: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2020-August/011785.html I got caught by this bug, too. I use a Compex wle900vx (qca988x).

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-08-27 Thread Alvin Šipraga
On 8/27/20 12:12 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: Alvin Šipraga writes: Hi Kalle, On 7/30/20 2:49 PM, Alvin Šipraga wrote: This reverts commit 2dc016599cfa9672a147528ca26d70c3654a5423. Per Atheros documentation to manufacturers, the EEPROM regulatory domain code 0x0 must always map to "US". In

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-08-27 Thread Alvin Šipraga
Hi Kalle, On 7/30/20 2:49 PM, Alvin Šipraga wrote: This reverts commit 2dc016599cfa9672a147528ca26d70c3654a5423. Per Atheros documentation to manufacturers, the EEPROM regulatory domain code 0x0 must always map to "US". In particular, it should not map to a custom world regulatory domain. For

[PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-07-30 Thread Alvin Šipraga
This reverts commit 2dc016599cfa9672a147528ca26d70c3654a5423. Per Atheros documentation to manufacturers, the EEPROM regulatory domain code 0x0 must always map to "US". In particular, it should not map to a custom world regulatory domain. For references, see [1] and [2] below. Furthermore,

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-06-02 Thread Brian Norris
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 8:42 AM Adrian Chadd wrote: > On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 05:02, Julian Calaby wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 5:18 AM Brian Norris > > wrote: > > > > > > This reverts commit 2dc016599cfa9672a147528ca26d70c3654a5423. > > > > > > Users are reporting regressions in

Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-05-28 Thread Julian Calaby
Hi Brian, On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 5:18 AM Brian Norris wrote: > > This reverts commit 2dc016599cfa9672a147528ca26d70c3654a5423. > > Users are reporting regressions in regulatory domain detection and > channel availability. > > The problem this was trying to resolve was fixed in firmware anyway:

[PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

2020-05-27 Thread Brian Norris
This reverts commit 2dc016599cfa9672a147528ca26d70c3654a5423. Users are reporting regressions in regulatory domain detection and channel availability. The problem this was trying to resolve was fixed in firmware anyway: QCA6174 hw3.0: sdio-4.4.1: add firmware.bin_WLAN.RMH.4.4.1-00042