Linus Lüssing writes:
> On 19/07/2022 17:03, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> It's not a hardware bug. Dating back to the original AR5416 11n chip,
>> most flags aren't valid for subframes in an aggregate. Only the final
>> frame has valid flags. This was explicitly covered internally way back
On 19/07/2022 17:03, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
It's not a hardware bug. Dating back to the original AR5416 11n chip,
most flags aren't valid for subframes in an aggregate. Only the final
frame has valid flags. This was explicitly covered internally way back
when.
Ah, thanks for the
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 at 15:28, Linus Lüssing wrote:
>
> From: Linus Lüssing
>
> AR9003 based wifi chips have a hardware bug, they always report a
> channel bandwidth of HT40 for any sub-frame of an aggregate which is
> not the last one. Only the last sub-frame has correct channel bandwidth
>
From: Linus Lüssing
AR9003 based wifi chips have a hardware bug, they always report a
channel bandwidth of HT40 for any sub-frame of an aggregate which is
not the last one. Only the last sub-frame has correct channel bandwidth
information.
This can be easily reproduced by setting an ath9k based
