have any idea of it?
-Original Message-
From: ath10k [mailto:ath10k-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Ben
Greear
Sent: 2018年3月22日 0:31
To: gary; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [ath10k throughput] low throughput in multi-user mode
On 03/20
@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [ath10k throughput] low throughput in multi-user mode
On 03/20/2018 06:44 PM, gary wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I have run the throughput test on veriwave.(from Ethernet to wireless)
> My AP suports 4*4, 11ac, mu-mimo.,wireless chip is QCA9984.
> At first,
num_push_allowed(always
zero).
Do you have any idea of it?
-Original Message-
From: ath10k [mailto:ath10k-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Ben
Greear
Sent: 2018年3月22日 0:31
To: gary; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [ath10k throughput] low throughput
On 03/20/2018 06:44 PM, gary wrote:
Hi all,
I have run the throughput test on veriwave.(from Ethernet to wireless)
My AP suports 4*4, 11ac, mu-mimo.,wireless chip is QCA9984.
At first, the throughput is about 80Mbps only with 16 users, so I force to
return true in function
Hi all,
I have run the throughput test on veriwave.(from Ethernet to wireless)
My AP suports 4*4, 11ac, mu-mimo.,wireless chip is QCA9984.
At first, the throughput is about 80Mbps only with 16 users, so I force to
return true in function ath10k_mac_tx_can_push().
As a result, when the user number
