Sebastian Gottschall writes:
> Am 14.02.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
>> (you forgot to CC ath10k list, adding it back)
>>
>> Sebastian Gottschall writes:
>>
>>> Am 10.02.2017 um 07:50 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
Sebastian Gottschall
... looks like some changes for 802.11-2016 because yeah, some clients
don't handle 80+80/160MHz right...
-a
___
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
aiee, some clients messed up freq1/freq2 handling in this way?
-adrian
On 14 February 2017 at 07:21, Sebastian Gottschall
wrote:
> Am 14.02.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
>>
>> (you forgot to CC ath10k list, adding it back)
>>
>> Sebastian Gottschall
Am 16.02.2017 um 17:20 schrieb Adrian Chadd:
aiee, some clients messed up freq1/freq2 handling in this way?
as it seems. but i have no proof for this. i just readed the comment of
the hostapd patch
but what i know is that breaking the api by handling this within the
firmware itself instead of
Am 14.02.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
(you forgot to CC ath10k list, adding it back)
Sebastian Gottschall writes:
Am 10.02.2017 um 07:50 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
Sebastian Gottschall writes:
Am 07.02.2017 um 13:14 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
(you forgot to CC ath10k list, adding it back)
Sebastian Gottschall writes:
> Am 10.02.2017 um 07:50 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
>> Sebastian Gottschall writes:
>>
>>> Am 07.02.2017 um 13:14 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
Ben Greear
Sebastian Gottschall writes:
> Am 07.02.2017 um 13:14 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
>> Ben Greear writes:
>>
>>> On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Ben Greear:
> I hacked ath10k to enable
Am 07.02.2017 um 13:14 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
Ben Greear writes:
On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 08:18 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 02/01/2017 10:45 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am
Ben Greear writes:
> On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
>> Am 02.02.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Ben Greear:
>>> On 02/02/2017 08:18 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 02/01/2017 10:45 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
> Am 01.02.2017 um 17:48 schrieb Ben Greear:
this code here has been used
if (arg->mode == MODE_11AC_VHT160) {
if (arg->freq < arg->band_center_freq1)
ch->band_center_freq1 = __cpu_to_le32(arg->freq
+ 40);
else
ch->band_center_freq1 =
even if hostapd starts now and ath10 doesnt brings any error. the
interface does not broadcast any beacons nor can i scan for networks
with it. all results are zero
Am 02.02.2017 um 21:50 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 12:45 PM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
+ if (arg->mode ==
On 02/02/2017 12:45 PM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
+ if (arg->mode == MODE_11AC_VHT160) {
+ ch->band_center_freq1 = __cpu_to_le32(arg->freq);
+ ch->band_center_freq2 = __cpu_to_le32(arg->band_center_freq1);
+ }
No, I don't think so. freq1 should be
Am 02.02.2017 um 21:37 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 12:28 PM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:32 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 11:29 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:18 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 11:08 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am
On 02/02/2017 12:28 PM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:32 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 11:29 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:18 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 11:08 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:05 schrieb Ben Greear:
On
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:32 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 11:29 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:18 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 11:08 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:05 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am
On 02/02/2017 11:29 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:18 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 11:08 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:05 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Ben Greear:
On
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:18 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 11:08 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:05 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 08:18 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 02/01/2017
On 02/02/2017 11:08 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:05 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 08:18 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 02/01/2017 10:45 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am
Am 02.02.2017 um 20:05 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 08:18 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 02/01/2017 10:45 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 01.02.2017 um 17:48 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 01/30/2017
On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 02/02/2017 08:18 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 02/01/2017 10:45 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 01.02.2017 um 17:48 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 01/30/2017 02:28 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Hello
On 02/02/2017 08:18 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 02/01/2017 10:45 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 01.02.2017 um 17:48 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 01/30/2017 02:28 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Hello
with recent 9984 firmares vht160 seem to crash the firmware itself for no
reason i see.
is there
On 02/01/2017 10:45 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 01.02.2017 um 17:48 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 01/30/2017 02:28 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Hello
with recent 9984 firmares vht160 seem to crash the firmware itself for no
reason i see.
is there any internal structure change in these
Am 01.02.2017 um 17:48 schrieb Ben Greear:
On 01/30/2017 02:28 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Hello
with recent 9984 firmares vht160 seem to crash the firmware itself
for no reason i see.
is there any internal structure change in these newer firmwares we
need to consider?
i also tested the
On 01/30/2017 02:28 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Hello
with recent 9984 firmares vht160 seem to crash the firmware itself for no
reason i see.
is there any internal structure change in these newer firmwares we need to
consider?
i also tested the even more recent firmware
24 matches
Mail list logo