Re: WMI version handling

2014-09-05 Thread Ben Greear
On 09/05/2014 06:23 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Ben Greear writes: > >>> Also I have been thinking that using firmware feature bits (for example >>> ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10_2 and ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10X) for WMI >>> version is not the best way. I think it's easier to manage all this if >>> we hav

Re: WMI version handling

2014-09-05 Thread Kalle Valo
Michal Kazior writes: > On 3 September 2014 17:00, Ben Greear wrote: >> On 09/02/2014 11:14 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >>> Hi, > [...] >>> Also I have been thinking that using firmware feature bits (for example >>> ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10_2 and ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10X) for WMI >>> version is not t

Re: WMI version handling

2014-09-05 Thread Kalle Valo
Ben Greear writes: >> Also I have been thinking that using firmware feature bits (for example >> ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10_2 and ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10X) for WMI >> version is not the best way. I think it's easier to manage all this if >> we have a u32 FW IE to provide WMI version. IIRC Ben was

Re: WMI version handling

2014-09-04 Thread Ben Greear
On 09/03/2014 11:56 PM, Michal Kazior wrote: On 3 September 2014 17:00, Ben Greear wrote: On 09/02/2014 11:14 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: Hi, [...] Also I have been thinking that using firmware feature bits (for example ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10_2 and ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10X) for WMI version is

Re: WMI version handling

2014-09-04 Thread Michal Kazior
On 3 September 2014 17:00, Ben Greear wrote: > On 09/02/2014 11:14 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Hi, [...] >> Also I have been thinking that using firmware feature bits (for example >> ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10_2 and ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10X) for WMI >> version is not the best way. I think it's easier

Re: WMI version handling

2014-09-03 Thread Ben Greear
On 09/02/2014 11:14 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Hi, > > This was "[PATCH] ath10k: Support 32+ stations." but I'll change the > subject as this a bigger discussion. I'll also drop linux-wireless for > now, I assume they are not interested about our discussion how to manage > firmware interfaces. > > g

WMI version handling

2014-09-02 Thread Kalle Valo
Hi, This was "[PATCH] ath10k: Support 32+ stations." but I'll change the subject as this a bigger discussion. I'll also drop linux-wireless for now, I assume they are not interested about our discussion how to manage firmware interfaces. gree...@candelatech.com writes: > From: Ben Greear > > Im