Re: ath10k: Missing airtime scheduler parts

2020-12-01 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Sven Eckelmann writes: > Hi, > > thanks for the reply. I will forward the information. > > On Tuesday, 1 December 2020 11:56:57 CET Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> I did recently rebase that patch to the current mac80211-next, actually. >> Sent it off to Felix for some testing, but if you wan

Re: ath10k: Missing airtime scheduler parts

2020-12-01 Thread Sven Eckelmann
Hi, thanks for the reply. I will forward the information. On Tuesday, 1 December 2020 11:56:57 CET Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > I did recently rebase that patch to the current mac80211-next, actually. > Sent it off to Felix for some testing, but if you wan to give it a go I > can post it to

Re: ath10k: Missing airtime scheduler parts

2020-12-01 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Sven Eckelmann writes: > Hi, > > I was asked what parts are currently missing for (a better) airtime fairness > with ath10k. I know that the AQL were merged and enabled for ath10k (and > mt76). But there was also the virtual time-based airtime scheduler [1] which > was proposed. I think the

ath10k: Missing airtime scheduler parts

2020-12-01 Thread Sven Eckelmann
Hi, I was asked what parts are currently missing for (a better) airtime fairness with ath10k. I know that the AQL were merged and enabled for ath10k (and mt76). But there was also the virtual time-based airtime scheduler [1] which was proposed. I think the development on that one didn't