Krishna Chaitanya writes:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 5:53 PM Wen Gong wrote:
>>
>> It happened "Kernel panic - not syncing: hung_task: blocked tasks" when
>> test simulate crash and ifconfig down/rmmod meanwhile.
(editing out hundreds of lines of unnecessary text, please edit your quotes)
>
Wen Gong writes:
> On 2020-09-08 00:22, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> Just like with the recent firmware restart patch, isn't
>> ar->napi_enabled
>> racy? Wouldn't test_and_set_bit() and test_and_clear_bit() be safer?
>>
>> Or are we holding a lock? But then that should be documented with
>>
defconfig
mips allyesconfig
mips allmodconfig
powerpc allyesconfig
powerpc allmodconfig
powerpc allnoconfig
i386 randconfig-a004-20201209
i386
allyesconfig
mips allmodconfig
powerpc allyesconfig
powerpc allmodconfig
powerpc allnoconfig
i386 randconfig-a004-20201209
i386 randconfig-a005-20201209
On 12/9/20 1:24 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Wen Gong writes:
On 2020-09-08 00:22, Kalle Valo wrote:
Just like with the recent firmware restart patch, isn't
ar->napi_enabled
racy? Wouldn't test_and_set_bit() and test_and_clear_bit() be safer?
Or are we holding a lock? But then that should be
allmodconfig
powerpc allyesconfig
powerpc allmodconfig
powerpc allnoconfig
i386 randconfig-a004-20201209
i386 randconfig-a005-20201209
i386 randconfig-a001-20201209
allmodconfig
powerpc allnoconfig
i386 randconfig-a004-20201209
i386 randconfig-a005-20201209
i386 randconfig-a001-20201209
i386 randconfig-a002-20201209
i386 randconfig-a006
allmodconfig
powerpc allnoconfig
i386 randconfig-a004-20201209
i386 randconfig-a005-20201209
i386 randconfig-a001-20201209
i386 randconfig-a002-20201209
i386 randconfig
On 2020-12-09 17:24, Kalle Valo wrote:
Wen Gong writes:
On 2020-09-08 00:22, Kalle Valo wrote:
Just like with the recent firmware restart patch, isn't
ar->napi_enabled
racy? Wouldn't test_and_set_bit() and test_and_clear_bit() be safer?
Or are we holding a lock? But then that should be
On 2020-12-09 23:00, Ben Greear wrote:
On 12/9/20 1:24 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Wen Gong writes:
On 2020-09-08 00:22, Kalle Valo wrote:
Just like with the recent firmware restart patch, isn't
ar->napi_enabled
racy? Wouldn't test_and_set_bit() and test_and_clear_bit() be safer?
Or are we
10 matches
Mail list logo