Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: remove ath10k_vif_to_arvif()

2017-02-09 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 23:14 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > If there > were accessors for the skb data / len fields (like we do for mbufs) > then porting the code would've involved about 5,000 less changed > lines. What generic mechanisms would you suggest to make porting easier between bsd and

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: remove ath10k_vif_to_arvif()

2017-02-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 9 February 2017 at 23:03, Valo, Kalle wrote: > Ben Greear writes: > >> On 02/07/2017 01:14 AM, Valo, Kalle wrote: >>> Adrian Chadd writes: >>> Removing this method makes the diff to FreeBSD larger, as "vif" in

Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-02-09 Thread Phyu The
Dear Ben, According to your test result of QCA9880 3x3, what could be the low performance issue at my side IPQ8064+QCA9880 with Ath10k? Is it really CPU related problem on WPQ864? thanks, Phyuthe -Original Message- From: Ben Greear Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 4:24 AM To:

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: remove ath10k_vif_to_arvif()

2017-02-09 Thread Valo, Kalle
Ben Greear writes: > On 02/07/2017 01:14 AM, Valo, Kalle wrote: >> Adrian Chadd writes: >> >>> Removing this method makes the diff to FreeBSD larger, as "vif" in >>> FreeBSD is a different pointer. >>> >>> (Yes, I have ath10k on freebsd working and

Re: 9984 VHT

2017-02-09 Thread Valo, Kalle
Sebastian Gottschall writes: > Am 07.02.2017 um 13:14 schrieb Valo, Kalle: >> Ben Greear writes: >> >>> On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: Am 02.02.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Ben Greear: > I hacked ath10k to enable

Re: QCA4019: calibration files and board files

2017-02-09 Thread akolli
On 2017-02-08 16:33, Sven Eckelmann wrote: Hi Anilkumar Kolli, we've noticed that your change in QSDK [1] removed the call to ath10k_download_and_run_otp in ath10k_download_cal_data after the call to ath10k_core_get_board_id_from_otp. We reported [2] this to ath10k when we asked for some