On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 23:14 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> If there
> were accessors for the skb data / len fields (like we do for mbufs)
> then porting the code would've involved about 5,000 less changed
> lines.
What generic mechanisms would you suggest to make
porting easier between bsd and
On 9 February 2017 at 23:03, Valo, Kalle wrote:
> Ben Greear writes:
>
>> On 02/07/2017 01:14 AM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
>>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>>>
Removing this method makes the diff to FreeBSD larger, as "vif" in
Dear Ben,
According to your test result of QCA9880 3x3, what could be the low
performance issue at my side IPQ8064+QCA9880 with Ath10k? Is it really CPU
related problem on WPQ864?
thanks,
Phyuthe
-Original Message-
From: Ben Greear
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 4:24 AM
To:
Ben Greear writes:
> On 02/07/2017 01:14 AM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>>
>>> Removing this method makes the diff to FreeBSD larger, as "vif" in
>>> FreeBSD is a different pointer.
>>>
>>> (Yes, I have ath10k on freebsd working and
Sebastian Gottschall writes:
> Am 07.02.2017 um 13:14 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
>> Ben Greear writes:
>>
>>> On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 02.02.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Ben Greear:
> I hacked ath10k to enable
On 2017-02-08 16:33, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
Hi Anilkumar Kolli,
we've noticed that your change in QSDK [1] removed the call to
ath10k_download_and_run_otp in ath10k_download_cal_data after the call
to
ath10k_core_get_board_id_from_otp. We reported [2] this to ath10k when
we
asked for some