On 05/09/2017 04:40 PM, feng guo wrote:
To whomever may can help,
Recently, I got one reference design board with a qca9994 802.11ac
Wave2 pcie module.
And now I have bring up the board, but I can’t get the wifi module work.
I want to know that does qca9994 have been supported by ath10k?
To whomever may can help,
Recently, I got one reference design board with a qca9994 802.11ac
Wave2 pcie module.
And now I have bring up the board, but I can’t get the wifi module work.
I want to know that does qca9994 have been supported by ath10k?
Regards
Feng
To whomever may can help,
Recently, I got one reference design board with a qca9994 802.11ac Wave2 pcie
module.
And now I have bring up the board, but I can’t get the wifi module work.
I want to know that does qca9994 have been supported by ath10k?
Regards
Feng
To whomever may can help,
Recently, I got one reference design board with a qca9994 802.11ac Wave2 pcie
module.
And now I have bring up the board, but I can’t get the wifi module work.
I want to know that does qca9994 have been supported by ath10k?
Regards
Feng
On 9 May 2017 at 05:57, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> Hey Kalle,
>
> it seems like there was some discussion here and I wouldn't expect too many
> more opinions ... do you think we can have a decision based on what has been
> discussed here?
(Note: FreeBSD has had in-tree
Hey Kalle,
it seems like there was some discussion here and I wouldn't expect too many
more opinions ... do you think we can have a decision based on what has been
discussed here?
I'd be happy to rebase the remaining patches if that is necessary.
Thank you!
Simon
On Friday, April 21,
The array fields in struct wmi_start_scan_arg that are checked here are
fixed size arrays so they can never be NULL.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1260031
Cc: Arend Van Spriel
Cc: Kalle Valo
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Hi Arend,
Quoting Arend Van Spriel :
On 9-5-2017 7:33, Kalle Valo wrote:
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes:
The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's address.
So these tests will always evaluate as false and
Arend Van Spriel writes:
> On 9-5-2017 7:33, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes:
>>
>>> The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's address.
>>> So these tests will always evaluate as false and
On 9-5-2017 7:33, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes:
>
>> The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's address.
>> So these tests will always evaluate as false and therefore the _return_
>> will never be executed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
Hi Kalle,
Quoting Kalle Valo :
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes:
The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's address.
So these tests will always evaluate as false and therefore the _return_
will never be executed.
11 matches
Mail list logo