Re: QCA6174 SDIO support?

On 2018-01-08 07:30, Marek Behun wrote: This branch is almost the same as mine (orig + high latency patches + sdio patches), therefore no QCA6174 SDIO node in ath10k_hw_params_list. On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 02:31:59 +0100 Sebastian Gottschall wrote: try this branch

Re: QCA6174 SDIO support?

Am 08.01.2018 um 03:00 schrieb Marek Behun: This branch is almost the same as mine (orig + high latency patches + sdio patches), therefore no QCA6174 SDIO node in ath10k_hw_params_list. the problem i see is that this chipset is not available as SDIO chipset from qualcom. i cannot find any

Re: QCA9377 USB Support

On 11/21/2017 12:01 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: Erik Stromdahl writes: On 2017-11-06 23:21, Jay Foster wrote: I am looking for linux driver support for the QCA9377 USB Wi-Fi device (0cf3:9378).  I see on the mailing list archives that a patch

[PATCH] ath10k: add sanity check to ie_len before parsing fw/board ie

From: Ryan Hsu Validate ie_len after the alignment padding before access the buffer to avoid potential overflow. Signed-off-by: Ryan Hsu --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6

Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [PATCH] ath10k: Add independent prio sta queue

> Using what I understand now, I using aid to select which txq will be > priority and sent out first. But when I testing this code with iperf, > it is not working as I think. 2 station both sending -b 400M -t 0 packet, > (maximum about 250M)I exepct the station I setup in param will take all the

RE: [RFC v3 03/11] ath10k: per target configurablity of various items

>> A good point, I didn't thought of that during review. No time to investigate >> this right now, but maybe Rakesh and Govind (CCed) can comment? Yes, ar->max_num_peers needs to be assigned with ar->hw_param->num_peers. This can create mismatch for wcn3990 target if we create multiple peers(

Re: [RFC v3 03/11] ath10k: per target configurablity of various items

Erik Stromdahl writes: > On 2017-12-22 16:19, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> I was a bit torn about this, I definitely see the need for this but on >> the other hand it creates duplicate data (for example two entries for >> QCA9377 chip). I guess this is the right approach, at

Re: [PATCH 03/11] ath10k_sdio: DMA bounce buffers for read write

Alagu Sankar writes: > On 2017-12-22 21:38, Kalle Valo wrote: >> silexcom...@gmail.com writes: >> >>> From: Alagu Sankar >>> >>> Some SD host controllers still need bounce buffers for SDIO data >>> transfers. While the transfers worked

Firmware Crash on qca61741 hw3.2

Hello, I just experienced a firmware crash: [Mo Jan 8 12:15:44 2018] ath10k_pci :01:00.0: firmware crashed! (guid 07b97ee6-5eb2-4196-b038-e3cad581c735) [Mo Jan 8 12:15:44 2018] ath10k_pci :01:00.0: qca6174 hw3.2 target 0x0503 chip_id 0x00340aff sub 1a56:1535 [Mo Jan 8 12:15:44