-randconfig-001-20240425 gcc
i386 buildonly-randconfig-002-20240425 clang
i386 buildonly-randconfig-003-20240425 gcc
i386 buildonly-randconfig-004-20240425 clang
i386 buildonly-randconfig-005-20240425 clang
i386 buildonly-randconfig-006-20240425
collie_defconfig gcc
arm defconfig clang
arm randconfig-001-20240425 clang
arm randconfig-002-20240425 clang
arm randconfig-003-20240425 clang
arm randconfig-004
randconfig-001-20240425 clang
arm randconfig-002-20240425 clang
arm randconfig-003-20240425 clang
arm randconfig-004-20240425 clang
arm s3c6400_defconfig gcc
arm sp7021_defconfig gcc
Conor Dooley writes:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 06:42:16PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> Marc Gonzalez writes:
>>
>> > On 25/04/2024 11:42, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> >
>> >> Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Do you prefer:
>> >>>
>> >>> Option A = never waiting for the MSA_READY indicator for
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 06:42:16PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Marc Gonzalez writes:
>
> > On 25/04/2024 11:42, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >
> >> Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> >>
> >>> Do you prefer:
> >>>
> >>> Option A = never waiting for the MSA_READY indicator for ANYONE
> >>> Option B = not waiting for
Marc Gonzalez writes:
> On 25/04/2024 11:42, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>>> Do you prefer:
>>>
>>> Option A = never waiting for the MSA_READY indicator for ANYONE
>>> Option B = not waiting for the MSA_READY indicator when
>>> qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator is defined
>>>
On 25/04/2024 11:42, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> Do you prefer:
>>
>> Option A = never waiting for the MSA_READY indicator for ANYONE
>> Option B = not waiting for the MSA_READY indicator when
>> qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator is defined
>> Option C = not waiting for the MSA_READY
Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Specify board data size (and board.bin filename) for the WCN3990
> platform.
>
> Reported-by: Yongqin Liu
> Fixes: 03a72288c546 ("ath10k: wmi: add hw params entry for wcn3990")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo
3 patches applied to
Eric Park writes:
> Resending as I forgot to CC the mailing list, sorry! I've added some
> more info since the last email.
Thanks. Let's keep the discussion on the list so that others can join.
> On 2024-03-11 11:21, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> But with modern CPUs I would have still expected
Marc Gonzalez writes:
> On 04/04/2024 17:28, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/04/2024 13:57, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>
Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> I'd say, we should take a step back and actually verify how this was
> handled in the vendor kernel.
10 matches
Mail list logo