Re: Frames acknowledged and silently discarded in firmware

Thomas, On 3/13/18, 5:53 PM, "Thomas Pedersen" wrote: Javier, On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Javier Cardona wrote: > Hi, > > We have resolved this issue. I'm sharing the details in case that might help others. > > The

Re: Frames acknowledged and silently discarded in firmware

Hi Adrian, On 3/13/18, 5:21 PM, "Adrian Chadd" wrote: HI, What were the mac addresses? Why were they so dissimilar? The addresses on the pre-cal files were 12:34:56:78:90:12 We changed them to manufacturer assigned macs. Thanks! Javier -adrian

Re: Frames acknowledged and silently discarded in firmware

Hi, We have resolved this issue. I'm sharing the details in case that might help others. The description of the problem was accurate EXCEPT that the acks that we observed on the sniffer were not being sent by the failed station (MAP2, in the context of my original e-mail) but by a third

Re: Frames acknowledged and silently discarded in firmware

HI, What were the mac addresses? Why were they so dissimilar? -adrian ___ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: Frames acknowledged and silently discarded in firmware

On 03/13/2018 04:42 PM, Javier Cardona wrote: Hi, We have resolved this issue. I'm sharing the details in case that might help others. The description of the problem was accurate EXCEPT that the acks that we observed on the sniffer were not being sent by the failed station (MAP2, in the

Re: Frames acknowledged and silently discarded in firmware

Javier, On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Javier Cardona wrote: > Hi, > > We have resolved this issue. I'm sharing the details in case that might help > others. > > The description of the problem was accurate EXCEPT that the acks that we > observed on the sniffer were not