Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] Seeing as alot of ath9k devices is PCI/PCIe or their mini equivalent it makes sense to set ATH9K_PCI to y by default

2011-11-17 Thread Gabor Juhos
2011.11.09. 23:57 keltezéssel, Daniel Kuehn írta: from: Daniel Kuehn dan...@kuehn.se Most ath9k devices are PCI/PCIe based, therefor making PCI/PCIe support default y helps those porting a config from 2.6 kernel series from getting non-functional wireless drivers with 3.x kernel series.

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] Seeing as alot of ath9k devices is PCI/PCIe or their mini equivalent it makes sense to set ATH9K_PCI to y by default

2011-11-17 Thread Daniel Kuehn
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:13:53 +0100 Gabor Juhos juh...@openwrt.org wrote: 2011.11.09. 23:57 keltezéssel, Daniel Kuehn írta: from: Daniel Kuehn dan...@kuehn.se Most ath9k devices are PCI/PCIe based, therefor making PCI/PCIe support default y helps those porting a config from 2.6 kernel

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] Seeing as alot of ath9k devices is PCI/PCIe or their mini equivalent it makes sense to set ATH9K_PCI to y by default

2011-11-17 Thread Gabor Juhos
2011.11.17. 16:39 keltezéssel, Daniel Kuehn írta: I agree with you there if it was removed before, maybe then only the help section of ath9k should be changed to say that you have to enable either PCI/PCIe or AHB support for it to work? Yes, adding a comment there would make sense, although

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: rename ath9k_platform.h to ath_platform.h

2011-11-17 Thread Kalle Valo
Hi Sangwook, On 11/16/2011 01:34 PM, Sangwook Lee wrote: On 15 November 2011 16:37, Kalle Valo kv...@adurom.com mailto:kv...@adurom.com wrote: Hi Sangwook, On 11/15/2011 01:23 PM, Sangwook Lee wrote: The patch series proposes to rename ath9k_platform.h to

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] Seeing as alot of ath9k devices is PCI/PCIe or their mini equivalent it makes sense to set ATH9K_PCI to y by default

2011-11-17 Thread Daniel Kuehn
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:44:59 +0100 Gabor Juhos juh...@openwrt.org wrote: 2011.11.17. 16:39 keltezéssel, Daniel Kuehn írta: I agree with you there if it was removed before, maybe then only the help section of ath9k should be changed to say that you have to enable either PCI/PCIe or AHB

[ath9k-devel] Problem connecting to ath9k driver using ioctl call

2011-11-17 Thread abhinav narain
hi, I make an ioctl call with SIOCGIWPRIV and it fails. I have included : #includelinux/wireless.h The pcap code makes the same call to the driver in enter_rfmon_mode_wext() defined in pcap-linux.c for sniffing. The compat-wireless-2011-08-10 driver has the header file in