Hey Shafi,
we had this checked out before, the EEPROM/EEP_ANT_DIV_CTL1 value is set to
00c9,
so bit 6 and 7 are on (as checked in this function).
Cheers,
Simon
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 04:02:12PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
> > further i check with the CCK/DETECT and MC_GAIN_CTRL in
Thank you for the response. The wireless device has 2 chips. AR9170 is
listed under Carl9170-supported devices and AR9102 is listed under
ath9k. However, AR9170 is the chip that talks to the software. Hence,
the device is not supported by ath9k.
http://www.wikidevi.com/files/Atheros/specsheets/AR9
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
wrote:
> Hi Sujith,
>
>
> On Monday 25 June 2012 10:49 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
>>
>> Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
>>>
>>> *MAC WoW registers
>>>
>>> back-off shift, MAC interrupt enable, magic p
Hi Shafi,
LSDK is a Atheros Release which supports AR9331. We are adding
applications on this.
We are unsure of how to confirm if the second LNA is enabled. How can we
check if the signals on LNA2 are being processed.
In the calibration data we are setting LNA1+LNA2 as primary. Are there any
ot
Hi Shafi,
We are facing similar problems with configuring the LNA2 of AR9331 for
diversity. Even though we try to set the RXCHAINMASK = 0x03, on checking
the value, it keeps showing as 0x01.
We are currently using LSDK-9.2.0_U10.1020. It appears that some where the
value may be hardcoded to 0x01
Hi Sunil,
>
> We are facing similar problems with configuring the LNA2 of AR9331 for
> diversity. Even though we try to set the RXCHAINMASK = 0x03, on checking
> the value, it keeps showing as 0x01.
chainmask is indeed 1 and its correct
(AR_SREV_9485(ah) || AR_SREV_9285(ah) || AR_SREV_9330(ah))
> further i check with the CCK/DETECT and MC_GAIN_CTRL in ar9485, it seems to
> be
> ar9003_hw_ant_ctrl_apply CCK_DETECT 80be6788
> ar9003_hw_ant_ctrl_apply MC_GAIN_CTRLL 13ef0200
> will check it out whats the one bit difference in CCK_DETECT
also could you provide the output of the attached p
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>> On Friday 06 July 2012 17:13:42 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>> [...]
>>> > I just also observer the chain0 is "preferred" unless the RSSI is so
>>> > poor in it so chain1 is ta
Hi Sven,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2012 17:13:42 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> [...]
>> > I just also observer the chain0 is "preferred" unless the RSSI is so
>> > poor in it so chain1 is taken.
>> > Please check if this work out for your case too.
>>
>>
Hi John,
On Saturday 07 July 2012 01:05 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
> Is there going to be a repost of this series? It looked like Sujith
> had a number of concerns.
yes, need to send a v4, that should address most of his concerns.
never got some time to look back, should start now! thanks.
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
