Re: [ath9k-devel] Time-of-flight positioning - Atheros

2014-11-03 Thread Wojciech Dubowik
Hello Everyone I am currently at a project where I am using Atheros Chipsets AR9590 with the ath9k driver on Debian. I am wondering how the time-of-flight information can be retrieved per packet in most recent Atheros chipsets. Could you tell me how that I get that out of the driver? Or

Re: [ath9k-devel] difference between AR9271 and AR9271L?

2014-11-03 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Am 03.11.2014 um 03:40 schrieb Ruiz Gaistardo, Esau E: Hi Development Team: Can you please provide information regarding power consumption for AR9271, in the 3 most significant states: IDLE, TX and RX?, Here are some independent measurements:

Re: [ath9k-devel] difference between AR9271 and AR9271L?

2014-11-03 Thread Ruiz Gaistardo, Esau E
Thank you very much, just one question, I noticed in the General notes “net” stat, Do you know if they refer to the netstats provided by Linux, (e.g. netstat -ic ), Regards, Esau Ruiz On Nov 3, 2014, at 1:16 AM, Oleksij Rempel li...@rempel-privat.de wrote: Am 03.11.2014 um 03:40

Re: [ath9k-devel] difference between AR9271 and AR9271L?

2014-11-03 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Am 03.11.2014 um 14:41 schrieb Ruiz Gaistardo, Esau E: Thank you very much, just one question, I noticed in the General notes “net” stat, Do you know if they refer to the netstats provided by Linux, (e.g. netstat -ic ), yes, linux, since all tested driver are linux drivers. Regards,

Re: [ath9k-devel] Time-of-flight positioning - Atheros

2014-11-03 Thread Graf Monika
Hey Wojtek Thank you for your help! Do you (or anyone else) know if I can get an NDA with Atheros? It is for my Master Thesis project at the ETH Zurich which I am doing in collaboration with a company, so I could request it through either of the two organizations. Thanks for your help! Monika

Re: [ath9k-devel] difference between AR9271 and AR9271L?

2014-11-03 Thread Ruiz Gaistardo, Esau E
understood, from the General notes, netstat seems to be not a suggested tool to measure packets traffic, Is that another tool for better accuracy to measure the (TX/ RX packet transmission process), or maybe go directly to the drive so I can measure packet traffic in the network? Thank you

[ath9k-devel] Support for 13d3:3408 in ath3k

2014-11-03 Thread Jeremy whocares
A windows inf file shows 13d3:3408 as VID_13D3PID_3408 = Qualcomm Atheros Bluetooth 4.0 + HS The wifi combo card is QCWB335 hciconfig --all hci0: Type: BR/EDR Bus: USB BD Address: 54:27:1E:58:4A:36 ACL MTU: 1022:8 SCO MTU: 183:5 UP RUNNING PSCAN ISCAN RX bytes:741 acl:0 sco:0 events:61 errors:0

Re: [ath9k-devel] The operation of Minstrel_ht

2014-11-03 Thread Ali Abedi
Thank you for your reply. Regarding number 1, does MRR used when no blockack is received? Because I believe transmission is done when the blockack is received even if most of the MPDUs are lost. Thanks, Ali On 14-10-31 08:04 PM, Kevin Hayes wrote: 1. multirate retry is still available for

Re: [ath9k-devel] difference between AR9271 and AR9271L?

2014-11-03 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Am 03.11.2014 um 15:21 schrieb Ruiz Gaistardo, Esau E: understood, from the General notes, netstat seems to be not a suggested tool to measure packets traffic, Is that another tool for better accuracy to measure the (TX/ RX packet transmission process), or maybe go directly to the drive so I

[ath9k-devel] Support for killer n1525

2014-11-03 Thread Joris Guisson
Hello, I recently purchased an MSI GT 72 gaming laptop with a killer n1525 wifi card in it. The wifi didn't work, so I took a look at the latest kernel release (3.18-rc3), and it seems there is no support in it for the card. I didn't find the PCI device id (0x003e) listed in any of the atheros

Re: [ath9k-devel] Support for 13d3:3408 in ath3k

2014-11-03 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Jeremy whocares wrote: A windows inf file shows 13d3:3408 as VID_13D3PID_3408 = Qualcomm Atheros Bluetooth 4.0 + HS The wifi combo card is QCWB335 Can you please post the output of /sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices ? Also 'sudo lspci -vnn'. Sujith

Re: [ath9k-devel] Support for killer n1525

2014-11-03 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Joris Guisson wrote: I recently purchased an MSI GT 72 gaming laptop with a killer n1525 wifi card in it. The wifi didn't work, so I took a look at the latest kernel release (3.18-rc3), and it seems there is no support in it for the card. I didn't find the PCI device id (0x003e) listed in any

Re: [ath9k-devel] The operation of Minstrel_ht

2014-11-03 Thread Kevin Hayes
Yes MRR would be used if no BA shows up. MRR is not used if a BA is received, but SW can lower the rate if it chooses. K++ On Monday, November 3, 2014, Ali Abedi a2ab...@uwaterloo.ca wrote: Thank you for your reply. Regarding number 1, does MRR used when no blockack is received?

Re: [ath9k-devel] The operation of Minstrel_ht

2014-11-03 Thread Bonzar
E m: V tv Ali Abedi a2ab...@uwaterloo.ca wrote: ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel ___ ath9k-devel mailing list