Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] ath9k: add a helper to get the string representation of ath_bus_type

2016-06-29 Thread Martin Blumenstingl
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2016-06-24 14:34, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl >> --- >> this is a new patch which didn't exist in v2 yet, it prepares the new >> function

Re: [ath9k-devel] What is the expected throughput of ath9k with 20Mhz channel bandwidth?

2016-06-29 Thread Matthias May
On 29/06/16 13:01, Le Tran Dat wrote: > Hi, > > I am testing AR9342 Throughput with 20Mhz channel bandwidth, using > OpenWRT/LEDE firmware. > However, the throughput result is quite low. About 65Mbps to 70Mbps > while the bitrate is 144Mbps. > While testing I monitor the CPU usage and it's still

[ath9k-devel] What is the expected throughput of ath9k with 20Mhz channel bandwidth?

2016-06-29 Thread Le Tran Dat
Hi, I am testing AR9342 Throughput with 20Mhz channel bandwidth, using OpenWRT/LEDE firmware. However, the throughput result is quite low. About 65Mbps to 70Mbps while the bitrate is 144Mbps. While testing I monitor the CPU usage and it's still free for about 30%. Is it the best it can do? How to