On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:12:37PM +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
In the case that a spectral scan is enabled the PHY errors sent by the
hardware as part of the scanning might trigger the radar detection and
channels might be marked as 'unusable' incorrectly. This patch fixes
the issue by
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:22:13PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:26:47PM +0200, Benoit Taine wrote:
We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id` over
`DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines.
This issue was reported by checkpatch.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 09:54:32AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 09:43 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:22:13PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:26:47PM +0200, Benoit Taine wrote:
We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 07:14:12AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
We have almost 1000 more uses of the non-macro version than the macro
version in the kernel today:
$ git grep -w DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE | wc -l
262
$ git grep const struct pci_device_id | wc -l
1254
did you check for
Just one minor correction in this looney email thread:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:53:22AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
v3.3.x on the other hand are *not* stable. They contain patches
backported from v3.4, but nobody guarantees they will work. There was
no v3.3.1-rc1, so the first time the
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:18:13AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:11:05PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org
wrote:
Just
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 07:59:14PM -0400, Sergio Correia wrote:
Hello Greg,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.3.2 release.
There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:43:33PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 12 April 2012 09:49, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
A revert is the same as a patch. It needs to be in Linus's tree before
I
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:57:53PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
Hello,
Am 12.04.2012 02:29, schrieb Greg KH:
is there any chance for this one to be included in this review cycle?
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg87999.html
Have you read Documentation
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 01:07:51PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
You can send stuff to stable yourself. The main rule is that it is
already in Linus's tree...
Stable folks, please apply 115dad7a7f42e68840392767323ceb9306dbdb36
for the 2.6.38.y tree.
Now queued up.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 02:04:54PM +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote:
On Thursday 24 September 2009 05:07:00 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
hw code for Atheros 802.11n hardware is commmon between
different chipsets. This moves this code into a separate
module, the next expected user of this code
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:04:32AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:52:32PM -0800, Joseph Cheek wrote:
Hi all,
Happy New Year! It's about 2:30 AM here and I'm up debugging my shiny
new DWA-552 AR5416+AR2133 XtremeN Desktop Adapter. Stock 2.6.28 gave
me the
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:19:22PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:24 PM, John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:20:32PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see
2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Luis R. Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
commit ca0c7e5101fd4f37fed8e851709f08580b92fbb3 upstream.
This should fix the SW-IOMMU bounce buffer starvation
seen ok kernel.org bugzilla 11811:
I don't see this patch upstream in Linus's tree. Am I just missing it
and if so, do you know the git commit id?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:51:22PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
We would get an oops on RX on -ENOMEM by passing
NULL to the hardware on ath_rx_buf_link(). The
15 matches
Mail list logo
