Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2013-04-22 Thread Simon Wunderlich
Hey Felix, just wanted to bump on this issue again, as it has not been applied yet - the patch seems still valid, and Mathias results appear to show that as well. What do you think? Thanks, Simon On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 01:35:49PM +0100, Mathias Kretschmer wrote: Hi all, On

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2013-04-22 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2013-04-22 12:08 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: Hey Felix, just wanted to bump on this issue again, as it has not been applied yet - the patch seems still valid, and Mathias results appear to show that as well. What do you think? Looks ok to me, let's get it merged. - Felix

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2013-04-22 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:15:56PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2013-04-22 12:08 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: Hey Felix, just wanted to bump on this issue again, as it has not been applied yet - the patch seems still valid, and Mathias results appear to show that as well. What do you

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-12-07 Thread Mathias Kretschmer
Hi all, On 10/30/2012 01:43 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2012-10-30 1:07 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: From: Mathias Kretschmer mathias.kretsch...@fokus.fraunhofer.de According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot time), the slot time should be increased by 3 us * coverage class. The code only

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-11-28 Thread Simon Wunderlich
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:24:21PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: [...] When I ran the test, the throughput degradation was so big that the links became almost useless. It was a long time ago, so maybe this was caused by another bug that has been fixed since. I will run another test with this

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-10-31 Thread Mathias Kretschmer
On 10/30/2012 02:24 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2012-10-30 2:00 PM, Mathias Kretschmer wrote: On 10/30/2012 01:43 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2012-10-30 1:07 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: From: Mathias Kretschmer mathias.kretsch...@fokus.fraunhofer.de According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-10-30 Thread Simon Wunderlich
From: Mathias Kretschmer mathias.kretsch...@fokus.fraunhofer.de According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot time), the slot time should be increased by 3 us * coverage class. The code only increased the ack timeout, which is fixed by this patch. We have noticed in our long shot scenario that we see

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-10-30 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-10-30 1:07 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: From: Mathias Kretschmer mathias.kretsch...@fokus.fraunhofer.de According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot time), the slot time should be increased by 3 us * coverage class. The code only increased the ack timeout, which is fixed by this patch.

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-10-30 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-10-30 2:00 PM, Mathias Kretschmer wrote: On 10/30/2012 01:43 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2012-10-30 1:07 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: From: Mathias Kretschmer mathias.kretsch...@fokus.fraunhofer.de According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot time), the slot time should be increased by 3

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-10-30 Thread Mathias Kretschmer
On 10/30/2012 01:43 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2012-10-30 1:07 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: From: Mathias Kretschmer mathias.kretsch...@fokus.fraunhofer.de According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot time), the slot time should be increased by 3 us * coverage class. The code only increased the