Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2] ath9k: Remove ath9k rate control

2014-02-06 Thread Ben Greear
On 02/06/2014 08:23 AM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Ben Greear wrote: >> Can you let us know the details on how your set up that TCP >> traffic? For instance, number of streams, write size, socket >> buffer sizes, etc? Upload, download, or are both similar >> throughput in your testing? > > Stock

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2] ath9k: Remove ath9k rate control

2014-02-06 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Ben Greear wrote: > Can you let us know the details on how your set up that TCP > traffic? For instance, number of streams, write size, socket > buffer sizes, etc? Upload, download, or are both similar > throughput in your testing? Stock OpenWrt (trunk) running on a 3x3 Scorpion board (AP136/AP1

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2] ath9k: Remove ath9k rate control

2014-02-06 Thread Ben Greear
On 02/05/2014 08:52 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > From: Sujith Manoharan > > There is no benefit in retaining the legacy rate control module > in the driver codebase. > > It is known to be buggy and has less than optimal performance > in real-world environments compared with minstrel. The only > r