On 05/17/2016 01:11 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-05-17 12:54, Zefir Kurtisi wrote:
>> On 05/14/2016 02:50 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> On 2016-04-01 11:37, Zefir Kurtisi wrote:
Tx power limitations at upper layers are interpreted in
the EIRP domain. When the user requests a given
On 2016-05-17 12:54, Zefir Kurtisi wrote:
> On 05/14/2016 02:50 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2016-04-01 11:37, Zefir Kurtisi wrote:
>>> Tx power limitations at upper layers are interpreted in
>>> the EIRP domain. When the user requests a given maximum
>>> txpower, e.g. with: 'iw phy0 set txpower
On 05/14/2016 02:50 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-04-01 11:37, Zefir Kurtisi wrote:
>> Tx power limitations at upper layers are interpreted in
>> the EIRP domain. When the user requests a given maximum
>> txpower, e.g. with: 'iw phy0 set txpower fixed 1500',
>> he expects the EIRP to be at or
On 2016-04-01 11:37, Zefir Kurtisi wrote:
> Tx power limitations at upper layers are interpreted in
> the EIRP domain. When the user requests a given maximum
> txpower, e.g. with: 'iw phy0 set txpower fixed 1500',
> he expects the EIRP to be at or below 15dBm.
>
> In ath9k_hw_apply_txpower(), the
Zefir Kurtisi writes:
> Tx power limitations at upper layers are interpreted in
> the EIRP domain. When the user requests a given maximum
> txpower, e.g. with: 'iw phy0 set txpower fixed 1500',
> he expects the EIRP to be at or below 15dBm.
>
> In
Tx power limitations at upper layers are interpreted in
the EIRP domain. When the user requests a given maximum
txpower, e.g. with: 'iw phy0 set txpower fixed 1500',
he expects the EIRP to be at or below 15dBm.
In ath9k_hw_apply_txpower(), the interpretation is
different: the antenna-gain is