On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 11:01 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Hallo all,
>
> so, there is no updates or critic on this topic. That mean, every thing
> is OK.
I tend to agree.
> I assume "suggested-fields/MCS extension for STBC and Ness"
> http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MCS%20extension%2
Hallo all,
so, there is no updates or critic on this topic. That mean, every thing
is OK.
I assume "suggested-fields/MCS extension for STBC and Ness"
http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MCS%20extension%20for%20STBC%20and%20Ness
can be moved to "defined-fields/MCS"
http://www.radiotap.org/
Hallo all,
this is probably third repost of this standardisation request.
History:
- 11 May 2012. initial request made by Simon Barber.
http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MCS%20extension%20for%20STBC%20and%20Ness
- 1 Okt 2012, Wireshark support this fields. Patches provided by
Wojciech Du
