Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k compliance with new EN 300 328 v.1.8

2014-07-20 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Adrien Decostre wrote: > Would you know if there exists an open software tool to trigger the tests > required for EN 300 328 v1.8.1. > > As far as I know, Atheros has developed the ART tool but this is not open > source software. Is there any alternative for ath9k? I am not sure. But, maybe the A

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k compliance with new EN 300 328 v.1.8

2014-07-20 Thread Adrien Decostre
Dear, Would you know if there exists an open software tool to trigger the tests required for EN 300 328 v1.8.1. As far as I know, Atheros has developed the ART tool but this is not open source software. Is there any alternative for ath9k? Many thanks in advance for any answer. Best regard

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k compliance with new EN 300 328 v.1.8

2014-06-03 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Adrien Decostre wrote: > I have read that a new ETSI regulation (EN 300 328 v.1.8.1) will become > mandatory from 31-12-2014 onwards. > > I am wondering if the current ath9k driver is already compliant with this new > regulation? > > Are the patches provided by Sujith Manoharan (“ath9k: Fix regul

[ath9k-devel] ath9k compliance with new EN 300 328 v.1.8

2014-05-22 Thread Adrien Decostre
Dear all, I have read that a new ETSI regulation (EN 300 328 v.1.8.1) will become mandatory from 31-12-2014 onwards. I am wondering if the current ath9k driver is already compliant with this new regulation? Are the patches provided by Sujith Manoharan (“ath9k: Fix regulatory compliance” http:/