Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/2] ath9k: fix compile errors

2009-03-06 Thread Gabor Juhos
Jouni Malinen írta: > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 00:57 -0800, Gabor Juhos wrote: >> This set will correct two compilation errors in master-2009-03-04 >> of wireless-testing. > > Thanks for fixing these and the no-RFKILL build issue! Looks like I > should try to get a build setup for testing ahb.c build

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] ath9k: version checking macro cleanup (was [RFC] ath9k: use correct init values for ar9100 devices)

2009-03-06 Thread Gabor Juhos
Sujith írta: > Gabor Juhos wrote: >> According to Luis request, here is the new patch-set with detailed >> explanations. >> >> Changes since v1: >> * rebased against master-2009-03-04 of wireless-testing >> > > Tested on AR5416, works fine. Thank you! Works on AR9130 and on AR9132 as well. G

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Set IEEE80211_TX_CTL_RATE_CTRL_PROBE in rate control for probe rates

2009-03-06 Thread Sujith
Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/rc.c | 13 - > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/rc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/rc.c > index 8327356..a35b525 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/r

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Set IEEE80211_TX_CTL_RATE_CTRL_PROBE in rate control for probe rates

2009-03-06 Thread Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan --- drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/rc.c | 13 - 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/rc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/rc.c index 8327356..a35b525 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/rc.c +

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Use suitable macros with 4k eeprom data

2009-03-06 Thread Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
This patch improves range and connection stability in AR9285. Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan --- drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/eeprom.c | 18 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] ath9k: version checking macro cleanup (was [RFC] ath9k: use correct init values for ar9100 devices)

2009-03-06 Thread Sujith
Gabor Juhos wrote: > According to Luis request, here is the new patch-set with detailed > explanations. > > Changes since v1: > * rebased against master-2009-03-04 of wireless-testing > Tested on AR5416, works fine. Sujith ___ ath9k-devel mailing

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/2] ath9k: fix compile errors

2009-03-06 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 00:57 -0800, Gabor Juhos wrote: > This set will correct two compilation errors in master-2009-03-04 > of wireless-testing. Thanks for fixing these and the no-RFKILL build issue! Looks like I should try to get a build setup for testing ahb.c build myself.. - Jouni _

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: always compile ath_radio_{en, dis}able

2009-03-06 Thread Gabor Juhos
ath_radio_{en,dis}able is only compiled if RFKILL is enabled, but it is required by the 'ath9k_wiphy_select' function. Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos --- drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/main.c | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/m

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ath9k: fix compile error in ahb.c

2009-03-06 Thread Gabor Juhos
drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/ahb.c: In function 'ath_ahb_probe': drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/ahb.c:136: error: 'aphy' undeclared (first use in this function) Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos --- drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/ahb.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/driv

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ath9k: fix compile error in debug.c

2009-03-06 Thread Gabor Juhos
drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/debug.c: In function 'read_file_wiphy': drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/debug.c:377: error: implicit declaration of function 'put_unaligned_le32' drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/debug.c:378: error: implicit declaration of function 'put_unaligned_le16' Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos -

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/2] ath9k: fix compile errors

2009-03-06 Thread Gabor Juhos
This set will correct two compilation errors in master-2009-03-04 of wireless-testing. ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] ath9k: move ar9100 version checking macros into a more appropriate place

2009-03-06 Thread Gabor Juhos
All other version checking macros are in a common location within the reg.h file. The AR_SREV_9100_OR_LATER macro is wrong currently, but will be fixed with the next patch. Changes-licensed-under: ISC Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz --- drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/reg.h |

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] ath9k: fix AR_SREV_9100_OR_LATER macro

2009-03-06 Thread Gabor Juhos
The current macro is wrong, because detects some AR5416 devices as an AR9100 device. The AR5416 devices would have performance issues after this change, because the contents of the ar5416 specific and of the ar9100 specificinitval arrays are swapped. Fortunately we can correct this with the rename

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] ath9k: cleanup AR5416 version checking macros

2009-03-06 Thread Gabor Juhos
Currently we have two different versions of this macros. Because they would have to do the same thing, we should simplify and merge them. Changes-licensed-under: ISC Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz --- drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/eeprom.c | 16 drivers/ne

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] ath9k: version checking macro cleanup (was [RFC] ath9k: use correct init values for ar9100 devices)

2009-03-06 Thread Gabor Juhos
According to Luis request, here is the new patch-set with detailed explanations. Changes since v1: * rebased against master-2009-03-04 of wireless-testing Regards, Gabor ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ath9k: version checking macro cleanup (was [RFC] ath9k: use correct init values for ar9100 devices)

2009-03-06 Thread Gabor Juhos
Sujith írta: > Gabor Juhos wrote: >> According to Luis request, here is the new patch-set with detailed >> explanations. > > Series looks good, but it doesn't apply on current wireless-testing. > A rebase is needed ? Probably. I will do it. Gabor ___