Hi all,
I am using ath9k/mac80211 on a PC Engines Alix with a Mikrotik R52n
card (AR9280 chipset), OpenWrt r21030 (kernel 2.6.32.10) and
compat-wireless-2010-04-21. I am injecting packets using a VAP in
monitor mode.
I have a doubt on ath9k_hw_init_defaults() in hw.c. In particular
during the
Lorenzo Bianconi a écrit :
Hi all,
I am using ath9k/mac80211 on a PC Engines Alix with a Mikrotik R52n
card (AR9280 chipset), OpenWrt r21030 (kernel 2.6.32.10) and
compat-wireless-2010-04-21. I am injecting packets using a VAP in
monitor mode.
I have a doubt on ath9k_hw_init_defaults() in
Yes, i'm still intrested in fixing your coding style issues ;)
If it's now safe to check it again, i will find some time to look at it this
week.
Michael
Am 08.04.2010 21:13 schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig...@atheros.com:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:41 AM, John W. Linville
linvi...@tuxdriver.com
Hello,
In order to move forward with noise signal reporting, I'd like to
share my current understanding of the way ath9k HW is working before
sending patches (unfortunately, I did the work before the introduction
of ar9003... so I need to redo the work).
The ultimate purpose of this work is
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:21:21PM -0700, Michael Sprecher wrote:
Yes, i'm still intrested in fixing your coding style issues ;)
If it's now safe to check it again, i will find some time to look at it this
week.
Michael
Go for it, after John merges our latest batch you should be good to go
Signed-off-by: Benoit Papillault benoit.papilla...@free.fr
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | 20
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
index c03821e..f0b2aa2
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:08:24PM -0700, Benoit Papillault wrote:
Signed-off-by: Benoit Papillault benoit.papilla...@free.fr
Looks good, thanks for this work.
Luis
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Hi All,
preaching
The chip *FOR SURE* *CANNOT* measure the thermal noise level!! It isn't
that sensitive. That said under some conditions it CAN measure the
local interference level which IS useful.
I am *VERY MUCH* in favor of making real time level measurements of
various parts of