Re: [ath9k-devel] Netlink interface

2011-01-11 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:40 AM, ravi veerad wrote: > Hi, >          Please can any one guide me, to find the files or function in ath9k > driver which interact with iw or hostapd user space tool using netlink > socket. As per study found that, iw tool use the netlink socket with > protocol  NETL

[ath9k-devel] Netlink interface

2011-01-11 Thread ravi veerad
Hi, Please can any one guide me, to find the files or function in ath9k driver which interact with iw or hostapd user space tool using netlink socket. As per study found that, iw tool use the netlink socket with protocol NETLINK_GENERIC to send the user space commands to kernel. And in

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] ath9k: Fix reporting of RX STBC streams to userspace

2011-01-11 Thread Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:29:54PM +0530, Bernhard Walle wrote: > While the driver reports > > ath: TX streams 2, RX streams: 2 > > in the kernel log (with ATH_DBG_CONFIG set in the debug module > parameter), "iw list" only reported > > [...] > Capabilities: 0x12ce >

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9220 / AR9223 mini-pci card

2011-01-11 Thread Michael Griepentrog
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:57 PM, JD wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:34 PM, C Anthony Risinger > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:07 PM, JD wrote: >> > Dear all, >> > I purchased an Atheros card from Ebay. It has AR9220/AR9223 >> > chipsets. Apparently, the card is a no-brand made in

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_hw_check_alive routine

2011-01-11 Thread Bill Jordan
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2011-01-10 1:23 PM, Bill Jordan wrote: >> >> This routine is failing a lot on my AR9160. The ((reg&  0x7E7FFFEF) == >> 0x00702400) test is the one that always fails. There is no debug >> messages in this path, so it may not be obvious whet

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] ath9k: Fix reporting of RX STBC streams to userspace

2011-01-11 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2011-01-11 9:59 AM, Bernhard Walle wrote: > While the driver reports > > ath: TX streams 2, RX streams: 2 > > in the kernel log (with ATH_DBG_CONFIG set in the debug module > parameter), "iw list" only reported > > [...] > Capabilities: 0x12ce > HT20/HT40 >

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9220 / AR9223 mini-pci card

2011-01-11 Thread JD
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:34 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:07 PM, JD wrote: > > Dear all, > > I purchased an Atheros card from Ebay. It has AR9220/AR9223 > > chipsets. Apparently, the card is a no-brand made in China. > > > > Linux kernel 2.6.37 builds ath9k drivers by

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9220 / AR9223 mini-pci card

2011-01-11 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:07 PM, JD wrote: > Dear all, > I purchased an Atheros card from Ebay. It has AR9220/AR9223 > chipsets. Apparently, the card is a no-brand made in China. > > Linux kernel 2.6.37 builds ath9k drivers by default. > But for some reason, I cannot get the kernel to see > the de

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9220 / AR9223 mini-pci card

2011-01-11 Thread JD
Dear all, I purchased an Atheros card from Ebay. It has AR9220/AR9223 chipsets. Apparently, the card is a no-brand made in China. Linux kernel 2.6.37 builds ath9k drivers by default. But for some reason, I cannot get the kernel to see the device ath0. Can you help me bring this card online? Than

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] ath9k: Fix reporting of RX STBC streams to userspace

2011-01-11 Thread Bernhard Walle
While the driver reports ath: TX streams 2, RX streams: 2 in the kernel log (with ATH_DBG_CONFIG set in the debug module parameter), "iw list" only reported [...] Capabilities: 0x12ce HT20/HT40 SM Power Save disabled RX HT40 SGI

Re: [ath9k-devel] unknown header type 04, ignoring device

2011-01-11 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Peter Stuge wrote: >> After the third hard lock and a power cycle the kernel says: >> >> [    0.375411] pci :02:02.0: [:0004] type 4 class 0x04 >> [    0.375416] pci :02:02.0: unknown header type 04, ignoring device >> >> After

[ath9k-devel] UNDERRUN / PHY ERR in /sys/kernel/debug/ath9k/phy0/recv

2011-01-11 Thread Bernhard Walle
Hello ath9k experts, can somebody explain what > [...] >PHY ERR : 96196 > [...] > UNDERRUN : 96196 > [...] in /sys/kernel/debug/ath9k/phy0/recv actually means. Is that normal, or a hardware problem, or a driver problem? Thanks for any pointers! Regards, Bernhar

Re: [ath9k-devel] Greenfield Support

2011-01-11 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Galen wrote: > What is the status of true Greenfield support in ath9k with AR9002/AR9003? > > Basic tests with hostapd, ath9k, etc. seem to show that it is not working > with AR9280. However, this could be a hardware or software (ath9k, mac80211, > hostapd) issue

Re: [ath9k-devel] 802.11 a/b/g/n dual-band PC card

2011-01-11 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Lara Deek wrote: >> I wanted to ask if anyone has any particular recommendations or >> preferences between the two PC cards that I outlined. > > Ubiquiti in general makes good products. thanks for passing the information > > > //Peter > ___

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc in master mode / 0cf3:9271 Atheros Communications AR9271 802.11n / USB TP-Link TL-WN722N / detachable antenna - RSMA

2011-01-11 Thread Sujith
C Anthony Risinger wrote: > Senthilkumar Balasubramanian gmail.com> writes: > > > AP mode is yet to be supported in htc. Please refer to this > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg52239.html > > > > > > > Sujith's patches can be used to test basic AP mode functionality. We > > are

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc in master mode / 0cf3:9271 Atheros Communications AR9271 802.11n / USB TP-Link TL -WN722N / detachable antenna - RSMA

2011-01-11 Thread C Anthony Risinger
Senthilkumar Balasubramanian gmail.com> writes: > > AP mode is yet to be supported in htc. Please refer to this > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg52239.html > > > > Sujith's patches can be used to test basic AP mode functionality. We > are working on addressing the buffering mode