Thank you!
Does that mean rate of every packet processed by ath_buf_set_rate()
would be set to the value written previously in this func?
But our work require a rate computing outside the driver... Is that easy?
May I know how you coded?
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Sujith wrote:
> Yoo Ka
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:39 AM, roel wrote:
> Check whether index is within bounds before testing the element
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Matteo Croce wrote:
> 2011/4/10 Peter Stuge :
>> rootki...@yahoo.it wrote:
>>> Did you experience much tx failure?
>>
>> You are asking for the exact information that was originally posted.
>> Please rephrase your question to be more clear.
>>
>>
>> //Peter
>>
Is there an easy way to get an EEPROM/OTP contents dump in ath9k?
Adrian
2011/4/11 Hasan Rashid
> That's exactly what I did, also, I had to add the vendor ID in the
> hw_init function for the driver to fully load. I got it to work after making
> these changes in the ath9k driver.
>
> Now I ha
Hasan Rashid wrote:
> The only problem now is that the driver transmit at non-HT rates only.
I guess that is the best it can do with a bogus EEPROM.
//Peter
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listin
I have contacted the manufacturer of the card as well. The correspondent
claimed to have used ath9k without any issues. When I first rant lspci the
output looked suspiciously bogus to me as well for this card.
I am using a Ubuntu 10.10 x86 distro and I have little reason to believe lspci
has
That's exactly what I did, also, I had to add the vendor ID in the hw_init
function for the driver to fully load. I got it to work after making these
changes in the ath9k driver.
Now I have a different problem. In AP mode using hostapd, the driver doesn't
transmit at a higher rate than 54Mbit.
Hi all,
I am able to print out the present operating frequency from the ath9k/main.c
file in dmesg and if I change the frequency using iwconfig, the output of of
dmesg shows that the frequency has been changed. As far as I could figure out
struct ieee80211_channel is defined in ./include/net/c
2011/4/10 Peter Stuge :
> rootki...@yahoo.it wrote:
>> Did you experience much tx failure?
>
> You are asking for the exact information that was originally posted.
> Please rephrase your question to be more clear.
>
>
> //Peter
> ___
> ath9k-devel mailing
rootki...@yahoo.it wrote:
> Did you experience much tx failure?
You are asking for the exact information that was originally posted.
Please rephrase your question to be more clear.
//Peter
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https:
2011/4/10 Larry Vaden :
> THANKS, Felix et al.
>
> From one of our production pops with a Ubiquiti Bullet M2 HP running OpenWrt.
>
> ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT (bleeding edge, r26358) --
>
> root@jv-2400-ap1:~# uptime
> 16:57:14 up 3 days, 14:15, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.04
> root@jv-2400-ap1:
Check whether index is within bounds before testing the element
Both spurChans arrays in modalHeader5G and modalHeader2G have 5 elements,
AR_EEPROM_MODAL_SPURS is defined 5. So unless a break occurs, in the
last iteration (i=5) we tried to access spurChansPtr[5] before testing
whether i was within
Check whether index is within bounds before testing the element
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c
index 4c0d36a..1
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Serene Gud wrote:
> I am using Fedora14 and not OpenWrt.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
There is some considerable discussion of channel switching in the .pdf
for IEEE Std 802.11TM-2007 which you can obtain by visiting <
http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11-2007
THANKS, Felix et al.
>From one of our production pops with a Ubiquiti Bullet M2 HP running OpenWrt.
ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT (bleeding edge, r26358) --
root@jv-2400-ap1:~# uptime
16:57:14 up 3 days, 14:15, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.04
root@jv-2400-ap1:~# iw wlan0 station dump | grep -i fai
--- On Sun, 4/10/11, Serene Gud wrote:
From: Serene Gud
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: how to change channels dynamically
To: "Larry Vaden"
Cc: "Adrian Chadd" , ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Date: Sunday, April 10, 2011, 11:36 AM
--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 20
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Sujith wrote:
> Larry Vaden wrote:
>> Hello Sujith, Adrian, Peter et al.
>>
>> Many THANKS for your replies.
>>
>> Again, as a newb (ready, willing and somewhat able to learn), I ask if
>> IEEE Std 802.11(tm)-2007
>> has been superseded/deprecated by later standa
--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Serene Gud wrote:
--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Serene Gud wrote:
--- On Mon, 4/4/11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
it depends what you're trying to do.
Are you trying to dy
Larry Vaden wrote:
> Hello Sujith, Adrian, Peter et al.
>
> Many THANKS for your replies.
>
> Again, as a newb (ready, willing and somewhat able to learn), I ask if
> IEEE Std 802.11(tm)-2007
> has been superseded/deprecated by later standards?
>
> [quote]
> 11.2.1.4 Power management with APSD
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Sujith wrote:
> Larry Vaden wrote:
>> While running
>>
>> |__| W I R E L E S S F R E E D O M
>> ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT (bleeding edge, r26548) --
>>
>> as a newb, on APs,
>>
>> root@hq-0900-ap1:~# iw wlan0 set power_save off
>> command failed: Ope
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Incorrect or misplaced EEPROM/OTP data, perhaps?
> From what I gather, the PCI ID on earlier devices is loaded out of EEPROM by
> the silicon itself at power-on. 'abcd' sounds a bit too convenient to be
> what's in EEPROM/OTP; so maybe it's a
Incorrect or misplaced EEPROM/OTP data, perhaps?
>From what I gather, the PCI ID on earlier devices is loaded out of EEPROM by
the silicon itself at power-on. 'abcd' sounds a bit too convenient to be
what's in EEPROM/OTP; so maybe it's a default value in the silicon?
(All just conjecture here at
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Mohammed Shafi wrote:
>> > Is this a serious proposal from Atheros, or just your attempt at
>> > a quick fix?
>>
>> No! its purely a personal idea (am completely responsible for the
>> mistake),and I will take a look at it carefully to fix this
Mohammed Shafi wrote:
> > Is this a serious proposal from Atheros, or just your attempt at
> > a quick fix?
>
> No! its purely a personal idea (am completely responsible for the
> mistake),and I will take a look at it carefully to fix this.
Sorry, I didn't mean that you made a mistake, just that
Larry Vaden wrote:
> <7>1 2011-01-01T00:00:12+00:00 jv-2400-ap1 kernel - - - ieee80211
> phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'minstrel_ht'
>
> Is there a run time option to set rate control algorithm or must we
> compile (certainly not a problem)?
Currently, there is no runtime option to chang
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Sujith wrote:
> > > How does a newb set power_save off on an AP?
> >
> > PowerSave support is mandatory for AP mode operation,
> > so disabling it is not possible.
>
> To clarify a bit, does power_save on mean that *other* nodes can use
> power saving on this network, as oppo
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 10 April 2011 22:52, Sujith wrote:
>
>
> > How does a newb set power_save off on an AP?
>
> PowerSave support is mandatory for AP mode operation,
> so disabling it is not possible.
>
> Wait, just to be clear, power save here in AP mode is to support whe
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Mohammed,
>
> Mohammed Shafi wrote:
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(ath_pci_id_table) = {
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x002D) }, /* PCI */
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHERO
Sujith wrote:
> > How does a newb set power_save off on an AP?
>
> PowerSave support is mandatory for AP mode operation,
> so disabling it is not possible.
To clarify a bit, does power_save on mean that *other* nodes can use
power saving on this network, as opposed to meaning that the *local*
nod
On 10 April 2011 22:52, Sujith wrote:
> > How does a newb set power_save off on an AP?
>
> PowerSave support is mandatory for AP mode operation,
> so disabling it is not possible.
Wait, just to be clear, power save here in AP mode is to support when
stations go to sleep (and go off-channel due
Yoo Kaku wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> We are doing some work on 802.11n Monitor Mode using PCI-E AR5416 card.
> And we want to control packet rates by radiotap header. However, it seems
> there are not
> enough supports on injecting MCS. So we modified the driver Ath9k and
> mac80211 but it do
Larry Vaden wrote:
> While running
>
> |__| W I R E L E S S F R E E D O M
> ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT (bleeding edge, r26548) --
>
> as a newb, on APs,
>
> root@hq-0900-ap1:~# iw wlan0 set power_save off
> command failed: Operation not supported (-122)
>
> but on CPEs:
>
> root@
Mohammed,
Mohammed Shafi wrote:
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(ath_pci_id_table) = {
> { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x002D) }, /* PCI */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x002E) }, /* PCI-E */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Hasan Rashid wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I recently purchased a Sparklan WPEA-121N, it uses the AR9382 chipset. It is
>> mentioned as supported on the device list, however, when I load that ath9k
>> modules no
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Hasan Rashid wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I recently purchased a Sparklan WPEA-121N, it uses the AR9382 chipset. It is
> mentioned as supported on the device list, however, when I load that ath9k
> modules nothing comes up.
>
> Does ath9k support this chipset? I compiled
35 matches
Mail list logo
